Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol Review

Rated PG-13 (Sequences of Intense Action and Violence)

Running Time: 2 Hours & 13 Minutes

Cast:
Tom Cruise-Ethan Hunt
Paula Patton-Jane Carter
Simon Pegg-Benji Dunn
Jeremy Renner-William Brandt
Michael Nyqvist-Kurt Hendricks
Léa Seydoux-Sabine Moreau
Vladimir Mashkov-Anatoly Sidorov
Anil Kapoor-Brij Nath
Josh Holloway-Trevor Hanaway
Miraj Grbic-Bogdan
Tom Wilkinson-IMF Secretary
Ving Rhames-Luther Stickell

Directed by Brad Bird

Don't look down...don't look down...don't look down...
Despite their over-reliance on established film franchises as a major source of box office revenue rather than actually taking the risk of coming up with original, creative new ideas and stories, I must grudgingly admit that I am continuously impressed with Hollywood in keeping said franchises long past their prime with fourth, fifth, and even sixth installments. If you take a look at the top-grossing films of 2011, the first seven are all sequels and this trend is unlikely to change unless audiences vote with their wallets. Now, I am not against sequels, prequels, spin-offs, or even remakes but only if there is a genuine need for one from a creative standpoint unless it was already announced by the studio that there will be a follow-up if the story is too broad to be compressed in a single film such as Peter Jackson’s adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien’s prequel novel to “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy “The Hobbit,” to be released in December 2012. Unfortunately, this is not the case as sequels are usually green-lit based on how financially successful the original was and often times, audiences end up being fed garbage like “The Hangover Part II.” When Paramount Pictures (who is currently celebrating its 100th anniversary) announced a fourth installment in Tom Cruise’s “Mission Impossible” franchise in early 2010, I was skeptical that any good would come from it as it appeared to be a desperate attempt by the controversial actor to reclaim his box office clout, which has waned since the infamous ‘couch incident’ back in 2005 and his strong ties to pseudo-religion Scientology. Although it received positive reviews from critics, the third film, “Mission Impossible III,” failed to ignite the domestic box office with a lukewarm $134 million and it appeared the series was finished. Not anymore as Cruise is back as IMF agent Ethan Hunt in “Mission Impossible Ghost Protocol,” which has surprisingly received overwhelmingly positive reviews with 93% on Rotten Tomatoes, a franchise best. “Ghost Protocol” does not break any new ground with its largely episodic and pedestrian plot but the film more than makes up for it with several thrilling action set-pieces and suspenseful moments, representing a rare trend where each successive follow-up improves upon the previous film. 

During a prologue set in Budapest, IMF agent Trevor Hanaway (Josh Holloway) is darting across a rooftop while dodging two enemy gunmen. He manages to elude them but is suddenly shot dead in an alleyway by a beautiful blond woman, who takes the satchel that Hanaway was carrying before shooting him a few more times. Former IMF agent Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) is currently imprisoned in Moscow when he is freed thanks to the efforts of Hanaway’s team leader Jane Carter (Paula Patton) and newly-promoted field agent Benji Dunn (Simon Pegg). Before making his escape, Hunt also frees fellow prisoner Bogdan (Miraj Grbic), who served as his informant. Jane reveals that she rescued Hunt because she needs him to help recover a package containing nuclear launch codes that Hanaway was carrying before he was killed by an assassin named Sabine Moreau (Léa Seydoux), who plans to sell them to the highest bidder. Hunt accepts the mission and learns that someone codenamed ‘Cobalt’ is attempting to acquire a nuclear launch code device at the Kremlin. Under the disguise of a Russian general, Hunt infiltrates the Kremlin with Dunn to look for information on Cobalt but is forced to abort when someone hacks into their frequency and leaks their location. Hunt and his team barely escape but a large explosion suddenly engulfs and destroys the Kremlin. The attack is blamed on him and his team and as a result, the entire IMF agency has been shut down with its existence disavowed. The IMF Secretary (Tom Wilkinson), accompanied with his chief analyst William Brandt (Jeremy Renner), reveal that it was Cobalt that hacked their frequency and that his true identity is Kurt Hendricks (Michael Nyqvist), a Russian-born Swedish nuclear physicist who is looking to instigate a global nuclear war to restore what he calls ‘ecological balance’ to the Earth by culling the weak. The Secretary informs Hunt that he and his team must stop him at any cost but due to ‘Ghost Protocol’ being initiated, he will receive no backup or support and that if he is captured, he and his team will be branded as terrorists. 

“Mission Impossible,” based upon the popular 1966 television series created by Bruce Geller, is a strangely inconsistent franchise as other than the character of Ethan Hunt each installment has little to do with each other as they contain stand-alone stories featuring a different supporting cast each time. “Ghost Protocol” marks the first time where the main character acknowledges previous events and disproves the long-standing theory that each film takes place in its own separate universe or alternate reality. As with the three films before, the MacGuffin-based plot is relatively straightforward despite its attempt at appearing more complex than it really is with its twists and turns. It feels as if all the locations and action scenes were planned out beforehand with the story thrown together at the last minute, making for its episodic nature as expositional dialogue are delivered in-between set-pieces. J.J. Abrams (who serves as producer this time) tried to develop the character of Ethan Hunt in the third film in order to make him more well-rounded and sympathetic but this approach has been largely jettisoned as “Ghost Protocol” is essentially a 2 hour race-against-the-clock chase around the world. What makes this fourth installment so enjoyable and dare I say, memorable, is Brad Bird’s (making his live-action debut) confident direction in filming the larger-than-life action set-pieces, immersing the audience by playing up the fact that anything could go wrong and keeping them from noticing its by-the-numbers story. Michael Giacchino also helps with a much more heart-pounding score compared to the previous film. In fact, there is so much action and fisticuffs being thrown that the plot comes dangerously close to becoming insignificant and forgotten. 

One of the main issues with the second and third films is that it lacked any iconic/standout action scenes compared to the original where Hunt had to retrieve a computer disk by rappelling down a nigh-impenetrable room that would sound the alarm if he so much as sweats or makes physical contact with the walls and floor. Bird tops that by having Hunt crawl along the reflective windows of the Burj Khalifa, the tallest man-made structure in the world, in Dubai like Spider-Man all in the simple hope of hacking into the building’s server room. He then makes it back to the room his team is residing in by running down the building with a fire-hose tied around him and making a huge leap of faith. Not content with resting on his laurels, Bird follows this up with a visceral car chase through a blinding sandstorm. Describing it as thrilling and suspenseful does not even do it justice and it has to be seen to be believed. I anxiously wait to re-watch these scenes in glorious high definition on Blu-Ray. In a clever nod to the first film, Brandt leaps down a large cooling tunnel with no rope, the only thing keeping him from falling into a deadly turbine and making a bloody mess is a remote controlled vehicle with an oversized magnet and his magnetized chain mail suit underneath his clothes. The large amount of tech on display would certainly make James Bond green with envy, straddling the line between fiction and reality. From screens that project holographic images based on the viewer’s angle of perception to contact lenses that can take photographs and identify hostiles, the toys used add to the fun factor of the film. Let’s not also forget the brutal fight scenes with such highlights including the one between Patton’s Agent Carter and Seydoux’s Sabine and the climactic battle with Hunt and Nyqvist’s Hendricks at an automotive factory. 

The acting is adequate for a film of this type but no one will mistake it as a masterpiece with the dialogue used to keep audiences involved rather than develop the characters beyond their functions. He may be pushing fifty but Tom Cruise remains a credible action star and has always turned in a good performance, even in his less well-reviewed films. Cruise has a certain unexplainable appeal and continues to remain as one of my favorite actors. Honestly, all that attention his off-kilter public behavior received is unfair as people should judge him by his work, not his love life. Although Jeremy Renner’s character was initially believed to be replacing Ethan Hunt, this is not the case but if it does comes to pass, I cannot think of a better actor to succeed Cruise. Renner has the physicality and enough acting chops to be an action star but the final word will arrive once his spin-off “The Bourne Legacy” is released into theaters in August 2012. Paula Patton and Léa Seydoux look incredibly sexy and badass as they go at each other with nothing but their fists. There’s some drama involving Patton’s character but the film spends too little time on it for us to care. Simon Pegg is of the few cast members to return and he provides a nice dose of comic relief that keeps the film from being overly serious. They may not amount to much individually but the cast works well together and have a surprisingly natural rapport. As for the villain, Michael Nyqvist (Mikael Blomkvist from Sweden’s “Millennium” Trilogy) is not as memorable compared to Philip Seymour Hoffman but it’s due to the fact that he has relatively little screen-time compared to other cast members. 

“Mission Impossible Ghost Protocol” had a limited IMAX release on December 16, 2011 before going wide five days later on December 21. Reviews have been overwhelmingly positive with 93% on Rotten Tomatoes as critics hailed it as ‘stylish, fast-paced, and loaded with gripping set pieces, the [film] is big-budget popcorn entertainment that really works.’ Those who saw the film in IMAX will have been treated to approximately thirty minutes of footage shot with IMAX cameras and also a six-minute preview from Christopher Nolan’s highly anticipated finale to the Batman saga, “The Dark Knight Rises.” I did not see the film in IMAX mainly for cost-saving reasons but if you are able, it is the preferred format to experience all that action in its full glory. Shot on a production budget of $145 million, the film has earned $390 million worldwide and counting. It has already surpassed the domestic gross of the previous film and will most likely overtake the original soon. When it comes to plot, “Mission Impossible Ghost Protocol” does not re-invent the wheel but it surely benefits from Brad Bird’s presence with his direction of some of the best action scenes I’ve ever seen. If only every action film was this fun and enjoyable.

Final Rating: 4 out of 5

“Mission ACCOMPLISHED!”