Saturday, June 29, 2013

The Way, Way Back Review

Rated PG-13 (Thematic Elements, Language, some Sexual Content and Brief Drug Material)

Running Time: 1 Hour & 43 Minutes

Cast-
Liam James-Duncan
AnnaSophia Robb-Susanna
Steve Carell-Trent
Toni Collette-Pam
Sam Rockwell-Owen
Maya Rudolph-Caitlyn
Allison Janney-Betty
Rob Corddry-Kip
Amanda Peet-Joan
Nat Faxon-Roddy
Jim Rash-Lewis
Zoe Levin-Steph
River Alexander-Peter

Directed by Nat Faxon and Jim Rash

Man, I wish I knew girls like her when I was growing up!
Note: Screened on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at AMC Loews Lincoln Square 13 (Red Carpet Premiere).

I wasn't the most popular kid in grade school. Whenever I was around other people, I would speak only when spoken to because I felt if you didn't have anything interesting to say, why say anything at all? That feeling of awkwardness, of trying to find your place in the world while being caught in between childhood and adulthood is a common experience for many teenagers, with Hollywood often mining this pivotal moment in our lives in numerous coming-of-age films. The latest is "The Way, Way Back" from comedians-turned-writers Nat Faxon and Jim Rash, both of whom are making their directorial debuts. The duo previously won an Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay for 2011's "The Descendants" alongside director Alexander Payne. Given the critical acclaim that film received (89% on Rotten Tomatoes, won Best Picture—Drama at the 69th Golden Globe Awards), it shouldn't be surprising to find that the distributor for Faxon and Rash's feature debut is once again Fox Searchlight Pictures. In fact, the studio paid a hefty sum of $10 million to acquire "The Way, Way Back" when it premiered at the Sundance Film Festival back in January. It's obviously an attempt to repeat the success of 2006's "Little Miss Sunshine" (with Steve Carell and Toni Collette even having a mini-reunion) but while it's admirable that the studio has so much confidence in Faxon and Rash's film, that kind of large payout sets up expectations that it may not be able to meet. That being said, "The Way, Way Back" is definitely a great film that's bolstered by a funny and honest script, as well as a scene-stealing performance from Sam Rockwell. The material isn't quite as fresh and leans a little too heavily on its all-star cast yet it functions as a charming alternative for audiences turned off by the summer's usual big-budget offerings.

Introverted fourteen-year-old Duncan (Liam James) is heading to Cape Cod, Massachusetts for the summer with his mom Pam (Toni Collette), her obnoxious new boyfriend Trent (Steve Carell) and his vain teenage daughter Steph (Zoe Levin). Arriving at her beau's coastal beach house, Pam is introduced to kooky neighbor Betty (Allison Janney) and prepares to settle down for a relaxing summer vacation with Trent's drinking buddies Kip and Joan (Rob Corddry and Amanda Peet). However, Duncan is none too happy about this arrangement and spends most of his days silently sulking around the house. He eventually sneaks off on his own and ends up at a nearby water park called Water Wizz. While there, Duncan meets the park's motor-mouthed manager Owen (Sam Rockwell) and quickly strikes up a friendship with him. Looking to boost the young teen's self-esteem, Owen offers Duncan a job for the summer. His experiences with his Water Wizz co-workers, which include the exasperated Caitlyn (Maya Rudolph), slowly draw him out of his shell, allowing Duncan to connect with Betty's teenage daughter Susanna (AnnaSophia Robb).

Like the 'modern warfare' first-person shooter, coming-of-age films are a dime-a-dozen these days (2013's Sundance Film Festival also saw the premiere of James Ponsoldt's "The Spectacular Now") so it's somewhat disappointing to find "The Way, Way Back" so formulaic in regards to its story. The film opens with Steve Carell's Trent trying to bond with Duncan (who's sitting in the trunk in the family station wagon) by asking the fourteen-year-old how he would rate himself on a scale from one to ten. After some prodding, Duncan half-heartedly responds with a 'six' but Trent thinks he's more like a 'three,' which is pretty much the worst possible thing you can say to a kid who already has low self-esteem (This apparently happened to Rash when he was that age). The very definition of a social outcast, Duncan is faced with a potential stepfather who's a complete dick to him and a mother who's willfully oblivious to his feelings. In fact, all the adults surrounding the insecure teen are little more than childish boors trapped in their own world. As one character puts it, Cape Cod is like 'spring break for adults.' Complicating matters further are Pam's attempts to step out of her own shell at a time when her son needs her most. Moving on from her bitter divorce, she settles with Trent despite his blatant alpha-male posturing. The way the film positions Duncan and Pam as similar outsiders adds a nice wrinkle to the proceedings, although Pam's subplot is underdeveloped. While the moment-to-moment drama will be familiar to anyone who's ever seen a coming-of-age film, Faxon and Rash manage to infuse their picture with a genuine honesty, even when the story is populated by eccentric characters like Allison Janney's Betty. Since the two directors are drawing from their own experiences, they understand that real life doesn't offer bow-tied happy endings and appropriately leave a few subplots unresolved. However, the film does close on a hopeful note, with Duncan better equipped to handle whatever curveballs life throws at him.

Faxon and Rash's script won't win any points for originality but the humor it brings to the table, along with the cast's excellent performances, help elevate the familiar material. Completely stealing the film is Sam Rockwell, who gives the wisecracking water park manager a delightfully roguish charm and even a subtle hint of regret that comes with being stuck in one place for most of your life. Allison Janney also brings quite a lot of laughs as Trent's floozy neighbor Betty, often at the expense of her lazy-eyed son Peter. Carrying the entire film, Liam James is superb as wallflower Duncan. He perfectly captures his character's pent-up insecurities and anger with his taut body language and constantly-averting eyes. Playing against type, Steve Carell is rather convincing as Pam's assh*le boyfriend Trent. Hell, not even five minutes into the film, I already wanted to punch his character in the face. Toni Collette grounds the picture as Duncan's mother, with the directors themselves even joining in on the fun as a pair of slackers who also happen to work at the water park. Maya Rudolph exudes warmth while Rob Corddry and Amanda Peet have minor roles. The weakest link is unfortunately AnnaSophia Robb. It's not that her performance is bad; she's just given very little to do besides fulfilling her role as 'the love interest' for the lead character. Still, this is an impressive ensemble cast that Faxon and Rash have gathered and their combined star-power is one of the film's major benefits.

Premiering at the Sundance Film Festival and set for a limited release on July 5, 2013, "The Way, Way Back" has been receiving positive reviews so far with 89% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics will likely knock it for not diverting from formula but reception should remain positive when the release date rolls around in a week. Audience reception was highly enthusiastic at the red carpet premiere this past Wednesday so it might very well turn out to be the next "Little Miss Sunshine," at least in financial terms. No, "The Way, Way Back" doesn't offer anything new as far as coming-of-age films go but it remains an appealing crowd-pleaser thanks to its wonderful sense of humor and ensemble cast.

Final Rating: 4 out of 5

"You’ve got to go your own way, and you, my friend, are going your own way."

Friday, June 28, 2013

The Heat Review

Rated R (Pervasive Language, Strong Crude Content and Some Violence)

Running Time: 1 Hour & 57 Minutes

Cast-
Sandra Bullock-FBI Special Agent Sarah Ashburn
Melissa McCarthy-Detective Shannon Mullins
Demián Bichir-FBI Director Hale
Marlon Wayans-FBI Agent Levy
Michael McDonald-Julian
Dan Bakkedahl-DEA Agent Craig
Taran Killam-DEA Agent Adam
Michael Rapaport-Jason Mullins
John A. Baker Jr./Spoken Reasons-Terell Rojas
Thomas F. Wilson-Captain Woods
Adam Ray-Hank LeSoire
Jane Curtin-Mrs. Mullins
Michael Tucci-Mr. Mullins
Joey McIntyre-Peter Mullins
Nathan Corddry-Michael Mullins
Jessica Chaffin-Gina
Jamie Denbo-Beth
Tony Hale-The John
Kaitlin Olson-Tatiana

Directed by Paul Feig

This is Boston's finest.
Note: Screened on Sunday, June 23, 2013 at the Ziegfeld Theater (Red Carpet Premiere).

Released two summers ago in 2011, the R-rated, Judd Apatow-produced, Paul Feig-directed comedy "Bridesmaids" not only went on to earn critical and commercial success (90% on Rotten Tomatoes, $288.4 million worldwide) but also managed to nab two Academy Award nominations (Best Original Screenplay and Best Supporting Actress), an all-too rare feat for the often-overlooked genre. Comedy films have long been dominated by men so it was quite refreshing to see one that was more female-centric. In fact, seeing "Bridesmaids" became something of a social responsibility because women are sadly still underrepresented in Hollywood. According to a recent study conducted by the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at the University of Southern California, women only comprised a mere 28.4% out of 4,475 speaking roles for the top-100 grossing films of 2012—less than in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010. That's frankly disappointing. Hopefully, this trend will reverse in the near-future because women have as much right as men to make us laugh, perhaps even more so. With "Bridesmaids" being such a smashing success, it shouldn't come as a surprise that Feig is trying to make lightning strike twice with his latest film "The Heat," starring America's sweetheart Sandra Bullock and Melissa McCarthy, who's certainly come a long way since "Gilmore Girls." Originally set to be released back in April, initial test screenings were so positive that it convinced 20th Century Fox to delay the film to summer and green-light a sequel at the same time! Well, it looks like the studio's confidence wasn't misplaced as "The Heat" turns out to be a crowd-pleasing, hilarious comedy thanks to the clever pairing of Bullock and McCarthy, although as far as buddy cop films go, it's still same-old, same-old.

Hoping to receive a big promotion, straight-laced and career-driven FBI Special Agent Sarah Ashburn (Sandra Bullock) accepts a new assignment from her superior Hale (Demián Bichir) to take down a ruthless drug lord named Simon Larkin in Boston. Ashburn's investigation quickly leads her to small-time street dealer Terell Rojas (John A. Baker Jr./Spoken Reasons) but her progress on the case comes to a screeching halt when she runs into the sloppy and foul-mouthed Boston PD Detective Shannon Mullins (Melissa McCarthy). The two immediately find themselves at each other's throats due to their oversized egos and different approaches when it comes to being officers of the law. Their tremendous friction even earns the ire of DEA agents Craig (Dan Bakkedahl) and Adam (Taran Killam), who just so happens to be working on the same case. Ashburn and Mullins soon realize that they'll have to put aside their differences if they want to take down Larkin and earn the respect of their disapproving colleagues.

Buddy cop films such as the classic "Beverly Hills Cop" and "Lethal Weapon" are a dime a dozen but all of them feature male leads while the women are reduced to being damsels-in-distress. Like "Bridesmaids," the fact that Paul Feig's "The Heat" has female lead characters represents a breath of fresh air for the well-worn, male-dominated subgenre but that's pretty much where originality ends as the script from "Parks and Recreation" writer Katie Dippold is awfully formulaic. Ashburn and Mullins are both outcasts whose unorthodox methods often put them at odds with their superiors (although Ashburn is more polite about her disagreements) but they're damned good at their jobs and prove to be nearly unstoppable once they learn to work together. The fact that they eventually realize how much they need each other is not even a spoiler—it's a foregone conclusion. However, the film does add one little wrinkle to the formula by acknowledging that part of the reason Ashburn and Mullins are outcasts is because they're women. 'I know we’re not supposed to say it, but being a woman in this field is tough,' remarks a burnt-out Ashburn as she bonds with Mullins over multiple shots of vodka. Despite being the smartest person in the room, Ashburn's male co-workers often dismiss her assumptions and find her to be arrogant and competitive every time she proves herself to be right. Mullins may be an excessive loudmouth but her dedication to her job has no equal. When was the last time you saw a police officer chase down a perp by throwing a watermelon at him? Hell, before Mullins even arrests a man (Tony Hale in a welcome cameo) for soliciting a prostitute, she takes his phone and calls his wife first!

Of course, the real highlight with Feig's film is watching Sandra Bullock and Melissa McCarthy butt heads due to their characters' overly mismatched personalities. McCarthy's role isn't far removed from her turns in "Bridesmaids" and February's horrid "Identity Thief" but what makes Mullins' abrasive attitude so endearing is that she genuinely cares about making a difference, even when she's mocking her captain (an appropriately exasperated Thomas F. Wilson) of having 'tiny girl balls, if little girls had balls.' Compared to other female comics, McCarthy ranks as one of the best and funniest thanks to her ability to make every word that comes out her mouth feel completely improvised on the spot. Bullock's Ashburn will remind some viewers of Gracie Hart from 2000's "Miss Congeniality" yet we've never quite seen the actress let loose in an R-rated comedy before. Watching the uptight and bumbling FBI agent finally crack and call her male co-workers 'sh*t jerk dick fu*kers' left me laughing in my seat because we're not used to seeing Bullock behaving this way and she's clearly having a lot of fun. Her excellent chemistry with McCarthy elevates the stale script, although certain jokes do fall flat or go on too long. At 117 minutes, Feig could've also been a little more judicious in the editing room but even when "The Heat" starts to sag in the middle, it still manages to remain consistently funny.

With Bullock and McCarthy dominating the film, the rest of the supporting cast is unfortunately wasted in one-note roles. Demián Bichir's character could've been played by virtually anyone while Marlon Wayans is nothing more than the token love interest for Bullock (which is rather ironic when you think about it). As one of the central villains, "Mad TV" alum Michael McDonald tries to come off as menacing but feels more like a pushover. Dan Bakkedahl and Taran Killam is by far the film's weakest links; the air literally gets sucked out of the room whenever they appear. Michael Rapaport pops in as one of the Mullins brothers but it's obvious that he's only on-hand to pick up a paycheck. Only Tony Hale and Kaitlin Olson (from FX's "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia") manage to make the most of their bit roles.

Released on June 28, 2013, "The Heat" has received largely positive reviews with 67% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics noted that it was 'predictable, but Melissa McCarthy is reliably funny and Sandra Bullock proves a capable foil.' It's definitely a crowd-pleasing film and audience reception was quite enthusiastic during the red carpet premiere this past Sunday. 20th Century Fox's confidence is paying off in a big way as the film is currently selling 50% more tickets than "Bridesmaids" at the same point, which means it's looking at a $35 to $40 million gross over opening weekend at the box office. "The Heat" doesn't reinvent the wheel when it comes to the buddy cop subgenre and it relies on its two leads a little too much to carry the film but it succeeds in what a comedy should do. If the already green-lit sequel maintains or even ups the laughs, we may just have a new franchise on our hands.

Final Rating: 3.5 out of 5

"Hey, has anyone seen the Captain's balls? Let me know! They're about this big. They're like really, really tiny little girl balls, if little girls had balls."

Friday, June 21, 2013

Monsters University 3D Review

Rated G

Running Time: 1 Hour & 44 Minutes

Cast (voice)-
Billy Crystal-Michael 'Mike' Wazowski
John Goodman-James P. 'Sulley' Sullivan
Steve Buscemi-Randall 'Randy' Boggs
Helen Mirren-Dean Abigail Hardscrabble
Joel Murray-Don Carlton
Sean Hayes-Terri Perry
Dave Foley-Terry Perry
Peter Sohn-Scott 'Squishy' Squibbles
Charlie Day-Art
Julia Sweeney-Ms. Squibbles
Nathan Fillion-Johnny Worthington III
Bobby Moynihan-Chet Alexander
Aubrey Plaza-Claire Wheeler
Tyler Labine-Brock Pearson
Alfred Molina-Professor Derek Knight
Bonnie Hunt-Karen Graves
John Krasinski-'Frightening' Frank McCay
Beth Behrs-Carrie Williams
John Ratzenberger-The Yeti

Directed by Dan Scanlon

Before they were the best of friends, Mike and Sully were bitter enemies in college.
Note: Screened on Tuesday, June 18, 2013 at AMC Loews Kips Bay 15.

Pixar, you never cease to make me cry. Why, just last week I was watching 2001's "Monsters, Inc." for the first time and I could feel the tears welling up in my eyes when Sulley said his good-byes to Boo. Riding a wave of critical acclaim that peaked with 2010's "Toy Story 3," the stalwart animation studio has unfortunately been faced with a creative slump for the past two years. "Cars 2" was released to negative reviews (38% on Rotten Tomatoes) in 2011 and was only green-lit with the sole intention of selling more merchandise since the original film generated over $10 billion in worldwide retail sales for Disney. Last year's "Brave" was a much needed improvement but it was still not quite up to Pixar's usual standard of excellence. For their fourteenth feature, the studio is once again revisiting one of their older films with "Monsters University," a prequel to Pete Docter's "Monsters, Inc." The idea of making a prequel to such a beloved classic struck me as a creative dead-end to put it bluntly, especially for a studio like Pixar who built its reputation on taking story-telling risks. Not to mention the fact that audiences weren't exactly clamoring for one either. The project just seemed like another disaster waiting to happen. Well, I'm glad to report that I was completely wrong about my suspicions. Charming, delightful, and laugh-out-hilarious, "Monsters University" doesn't stand up to Pixar's finest efforts but it remains an entertaining film in its own right thanks to its cleverly subversive humor and strong voice acting.

"Monsters University" is preceded by an adorable six minute short titled "The Blue Umbrella," which pushes Pixar's CG animation toward photorealism. Ever since he was a child, Michael 'Mike' Wazowski (Billy Crystal) has dreamed of becoming a famous 'scarer' after meeting one of his idols, 'Frightening' Frank McCay (John Krasinski), during a school field trip to Monsters, Inc. Encouraged by McCay's advice, a seventeen-year-old Mike enrolls in the prestigious Monsters University to pursue a degree in scaring. To keep up with the rigorous demands of the school's 'scaring program,' Mike studies day-and-night with his nerdy roommate Randall 'Randy' Boggs (Steve Buscemi) but the faculty, especially Dean Hardscrabble (Helen Mirrin), expresses doubt over the young cyclops' abilities and urge him to quit while he's ahead. Also looking to become a top scarer is James P. 'Sulley' Sullivan (John Goodman), who's hoping to cruise past the program on his family name alone. Quickly becoming bitter rivals, Mike and Sulley's competitiveness soon leads to their expulsion from the scaring program by Hardscrabble during their final exam. Not about to let his dreams die, Mike joins up with outcast fraternity Oozma Kappa in order to compete in the annual Scare Games. Unfortunately, his team, which includes middle-aged student Don Carlton (Joel Murray), two-headed monster Terri and Terry (Sean Hayes and Dave Foley), pushover Squishy (Peter Sohn), and New Age Philosopher Art (Charlie Day), are complete laughingstocks on campus. To whip these ghouls into shape, Mike is forced to put aside his differences and work with Sulley.

Just like "Cars 2" is Pixar's take on the spy thrillers of yesteryear, "Monsters University" functions as a good-natured callback to the college flicks of the 1980's. The major difference is that Dan Scanlon's film is actually good. One of the things I love about Pixar is the way they consistently raise the bar for CG animation and this film is no different. Take for example Mike's first day as a college freshman. Stumbling around the campus green, he encounters all manner of outlandish monsters going about their business, from Godzilla-sized behemoths playing Frisbee on the quad to the various clubs trying to draw in new members in their own eccentric ways (for the art club, a fuzzy monster dumps paint all over its body and then slaps itself on a white canvas). The studio's continued technological prowess is on full display here, with every colorful frame packed to the brim with all manner of cuddly, multi-eyed and multi-limbed creatures, lending the world of Monstropolis a rich and bizarre texture. The 3D is also utilized very well, creating a nice sense of depth that gives the university and the various characters that inhabit it a tangible quality. It's definitely not a revelation but the added effect is handled with care and precision, which is more than I can say for other 3D features (I'm looking at you, "World War Z.")

Written by Scanlon, Robert L. Baird, and Daniel Gerson, the story in "Monsters University" adheres very closely to Jeff Kanew's seminal 1984 comedy "Revenge of the Nerds." The rather formulaic script is by far the film's biggest flaw but the hilarious comedy fortunately makes up for any shortcomings. In fact, this is the funniest Pixar feature yet, with its humor subtly subverting our expectations. When Mike is about to enter his dorm room, he announces that 'behind this door will be my lifelong friend and companion' and opens it to find Randall Boggs, a shy, spectacles-wearing nerd who sometimes has trouble controlling his chameleon-like abilities. Given what we know will happen, these little in-jokes (including an appearance from a particular slug) certainly lends a fun irony to the proceedings. The various challenges of the Scare Games are entertaining to watch and one of the highlights is seeing how Mike's motley crew overcomes each obstacle. Of course, this is the story of how Mike and Sulley became the best friends that we saw in "Monsters, Inc." and once again, Scanlon plays with our expectations. What appears to be a simple tale of two people realizing that they have much more common turns out to be something more complex. Pixar has always excelled in packing their films with thematic content that appeals to both kids and adults, and what "Monsters University" is really about is that sometimes, it's okay to fail. Children are often told that they can accomplish anything if they'd just 'follow their dreams' but the reality is that not every dream can come true. This in no way means you're a failure; it just means that your path lies elsewhere and I found this very refreshing in an animated film. Mike and Sulley's heart-to-heart at the end not only deepen their friendship and bond, it damn-near made me cry.

The voice acting is top notch across the board. Unlike other animation studios who try to draw in solely big celebrity names, Pixar focuses on choosing the right actor or actress whose voice best embodies the character that they're portraying. It's what puts their films a cut above the rest. Returning to their roles twelve years later, Billy Crystal and John Goodman have not lost a step and hearing these two verbally spar is just delightful. Their passion for Mike and Sulley shines through in their energetic voice work and the easy chemistry they share is palpable in every scene. Making a memorable impression is Helen Mirren as the half-dragon/half-centipede Dean Hardscrabble. Her smooth voice chills you to the bone and the creature design for her character is beyond words. It inspires both awe and fear. The various actors that bring the Oozma Kappa fraternity to life are also great, with Charlie Day being a standout as laid-back weird guy Art. Aubrey Plaza and Nathan Fillion round out the talented cast, with Plaza voicing Goth girl Claire Wheeler and Fillion as Roar Omega Roar's overconfident leader Johnny Worthington.

Released on June 21, 2013, "Monsters University" has received largely positive reviews with 77% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics noted that 'it doesn't scale the heights of Pixar's finest efforts, but [the film] is still funny and thoughtful family entertainment for viewers of any age.' Given the pedigree of the Pixar brand, the film should easily top the weekend box office, even with competition from Brad Pitt's "World War Z" and last week's reigning champion "Man of Steel." The highly enthusiastic response at Tuesday's advance screening is a clear indication that many are still fans of the studio's work despite their less-than stellar outings from the last two years. No, it's not the instant classic that many were hoping for but "Monsters University" manages to justify its existence by exploring Mike and Sulley's friendship in new and unexpected ways while providing plenty of hearty laughs. It's a second-tier film that still blows all other rival animated features out of the water.

Final Rating: 4 out of 5

"If you’re not scary, what kind of a monster are you?"

Thursday, June 20, 2013

World War Z 3D Review

Rated PG-13 (Intense Frightening Zombie Sequences, Violence and Disturbing Images)

Running Time: 1 Hour & 56 Minutes

Cast-
Brad Pitt-Gerry Lane
Mireille Enos-Karin Lane
Abigail Hargrove-Rachel Lane
Sterling Jerins-Constance Lane
Fana Mokoena-U.N. Deputy Secretary General Thierry Umutoni
Daniella Kertesz-Segen
James Badge Dale-Captain Speke
Ludi Boeken-Jurgen Warmbrunn
Elyes Gabel-Dr. Andrew Fassbach
David Morse-Gunter Haffner
Matthew Fox-Parajumper
Fabrizio Zacharee Guido-Tomas
David Andrews-U.S. Naval Commander Mullenaro
Peter Capaldi-W.H.O. Doctor
Pierfrancesco Favino-W.H.O. Doctor
Ruth Negga-W.H.O. Doctor
Moritz Bleibtreu-W.H.O. Doctor

Directed by Marc Forster

Brad Pitt battles the zombies in Marc Forster's "World War Z."
Note: Screened on Monday, June 17, 2013 at Regal E-Walk Stadium 13.

How would YOU survive the zombie apocalypse? Realistically speaking, the answer for most people is sadly 'we wouldn't,' unless you're Brad Pitt, who stars in the summer blockbuster "World War Z," loosely (and I must emphasize this word) based on the 2006 novel of the same name from author Max Brooks (yes, son of comedian/filmmaker Mel Brooks). Once a neglected subgenre that appealed to a niche audience, zombies have exploded in popularity recently thanks to television shows like AMC's "The Walking Dead.' The Marc Forster-directed film arrives this Friday with a ton of baggage as the production was infamously plagued by budget overruns (from $125 to around $200 million), reshoots, and extensive script rewrites. In fact, the original ending, which climaxed with a large-scale battle set in Russia, was completely scrapped as it was deemed too 'abrupt and incoherent' due to the script not being finalized in advance. Damon Lindelof and Drew Goddard were hired by Paramount to write a new ending at the last minute, which meant an additional thirty to forty minutes of new footage had to be shot in order to salvage the picture. Given all the negative publicity, it's a wonder that the film didn't turn out to be a total disaster. Riding on the coattails of its lead star and hurtling at a breakneck pace, "World War Z" manages to entertain with its sense of scale and thrilling set-pieces but the film will ultimately be remembered more for the trouble it took in adapting Brooks' novel for the big-screen.

As a zombie pandemic spreads across the globe and threatens to bring humanity to extinction, former United Nations investigator Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt) is forced to come out of retirement to search for a potential cure. Leaving his wife Karin (Mireille Enos) and two daughters (Abigail Hargrove and Sterling Jerins) in the care of his friend, U.N. Deputy Secretary General Thierry Umutoni (Fana Mokoena), Gerry is teamed with a young virologist (Elyes Gabel) and sent to South Korea to locate 'Patient Zero.' Surviving an endless onslaught of undead, his mission soon takes him to Jerusalem and finally to Cardiff, where he makes a startling discovery that may just buy the world some time…but at the cost of his own life.

You can definitely tell that "World War Z" is a cobbled mess, but it's a mess that's always consistently entertaining. For diehard fans of Max Brooks' novel, the film will no doubt be a disappointment as it bears absolutely no resemblance to the source material with the exception of its title and premise. Inspired by Studs Terkel's The Good War: An Oral History of World War Two and similar in style to Whitley Strieber and James Kunetka's Warday, Brooks' novel is presented as a series of interviews that recount the story's eponymous 'Zombie War' one decade after it began. Unfortunately, the epistolary nature of the book made it hard to translate to the big screen and much of it had to be streamlined for a mainstream audience. Even the origin of the zombie virus was changed from China to South Korea so as to not offend Chinese censors. The end result is very much watered-down; many of the themes that Brooks explored, such as government ineptitude and human shortsightedness, have been excised. What Forster's film does capture from the novel is the fear and uncertainty that comes with a zombie apocalypse. "World War Z" literally hits the ground running; after a brief introduction where Gerry's family enjoys a breakfast together, they're thrown into the middle of the end of the world as chaos suddenly erupts on a Philadelphia street (actually Glasgow). It's a thrilling sequence, with Gerry and his family making a desperate escape on an RV to Newark, only to find the city in complete anarchy as citizens run around and grab whatever they can get their hands on. What makes these scenes so frighteningly effective is their realness. When society is faced with such a scenario, it's pretty much every man, woman, and child for themselves.

The Lanes eventually hole up in an apartment for the night before making a mad dash to the roof, where a U.N.-sent helicopter awaits to retrieve them. Like 2008's "Quantum of Solace," Forster uses shaky cam to create a sense of disorientation but this technique does not translate well in 3D. One of the biggest flaws with this film is the 3D conversion, and what's surprising is how lazy it is. I thought Hollywood was past this given the negative reaction to "Clash of the Titans" three years ago. It's clear that Forster made no consideration to the 3D while shooting and the end result is a film that looks muddled and dim for much of its two-hour running time. Thankfully, the massive set-pieces save "World War Z" and the pacing is just relentless. The highlight is by far the Jerusalem sequence, where the city has walled itself off from the rest of the world, one of the few aspects lifted from the novel intact. Of course, the zombies manage to break through by crawling over themselves to reach the top. The CG for the most part is good and gives the undead in the film a horde-like nature. Without even pausing for breath, Gerry comes face to face with an outbreak on a passenger plane to Cardiff. This leads into the new ending that Lindelof and Goddard wrote and it's very different from what came before. The scale is ramped down considerably and feels more at home with a typical, low-budget zombie movie. That's not a knock against the third act though as it brings back the tension and suspense we saw in the beginning. It's really a miracle that "World War Z" managed to come together in the end. Sure, character development is kept to a minimum and the violence is handicapped by the PG-13 rating but it's never boring and even quite gripping at times.

This is entirely Brad Pitt's show and although it won't go down as one of the actor's best, he delivers a satisfactory performance as a reluctant hero with the fate of the world on his shoulders. In fact, his presence is a big part of what makes the film so entertaining because it's not often that we see Pitt starring in a summer blockbuster like this. Sadly, the rest of the supporting cast is completely wasted. Mireille Enos is given the thankless role of playing the worried wife while Ludi Boeken's Mossad agent is utilized only to dump exposition on the audience. James Badge Dale and David Morse pop in for five minutes and are promptly swept aside, with "Lost" alum Matthew Fox reduced to a bit role as a parajumper. Only Daniella Kertesz manages to make an impression as a Segen from the Israeli military who aids Pitt during the third act in Cardiff.

To be released on June 21, 2013, "World War Z" has received largely positive reviews so far with 75% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics noted that it was 'uneven—and fans of the book may be annoyed by how thoroughly it diverges from the source material—but [the film] still brings smart, fast-moving thrills and a solid performance from Brad Pitt to the zombie genre.' Interest has been high given how popular zombies currently are and the combination of Pitt's name with the acclaim of Brooks' novel should translate into a strong opening at the weekend box office behind Pixar's "Monsters University." It'll easily cruise to $100 million but Paramount will have to look to international grosses if it wants to recoup all the money that was spent on reshoots and rewrites. At the end of the day, "World War Z" is merely a good zombie flick and that's all you can really hope for given all the trouble the film faced on its journey to theaters.

Final Rating: 3 out of 5

"Don't pretend your family is exempt when we talk about the end of humanity."

Saturday, June 15, 2013

White House Down Review

Rated PG-13 (Prolonged Sequences of Action and Violence including Intense Gunfire and Explosions, Some Language and a Brief Sexual Image)

Running Time: 2 Hours & 17 Minutes

Cast-
Channing Tatum-John Cale
Jamie Foxx-President James Sawyer
Joey King-Emily Cale
Maggie Gyllenhaal-Secret Service Director Carol Finnerty
Richard Jenkins-Speaker of the House Eli Raphelson
Jason Clarke-Emil Stenz
James Woods-Martin Walker
Jimmi Simpson-Tyler
Nicolas Wright-Donnie Donaldson
Rachelle Lefevre-Melanie Cale
Lance Reddick-General Caulfield
Michael Murphy-Vice President Alvin Hammond
Garcelle Beauvais-First Lady Alison Sawyer
Andrew Simms-Roger Skinner
Jackie Geary-Jenna

Directed by Roland Emmerich

President Obama, is that you?
Note: Screened on Thursday, June 13, 2013 at Regal Union Square Stadium 14.

Channing Tatum has certainly come a long way from his days as male stripper 'Chan Crawford.' The former model-turned-actor/producer didn't exactly make the best impression when I first saw him back in 2009's "G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra" (I have not seen "Step Up" nor any of its sequels), where I described him as 'a macho-man cardboard cutout.' What a difference three years makes as 2012 proved to be a banner year for Tatum, with "The Vow," "21 Jump Street," and "Magic Mike" all grossing over $100 million. Hoping to continue his leading-man hot streak, Tatum once again flexes his muscles in the action genre in Roland Emmerich's "White House Down," which also stars Jamie Foxx. The film focuses on a paramilitary group who take over the White House and…wait a minute, doesn't this all sound really familiar? Yes, it does because March's "Olympus Has Fallen" featured the exact same premise! This isn't the first time something like this has happened as last year saw the release of two Snow White films, Tarsem Singh's "Mirror Mirror" and Rupert Sanders' "Snow White and the Huntsman." What's really ironic is that both the scripts for "Olympus Has Fallen" and "White House Down" were purchased by their respective studios around the same time. I found Antoine Fuqua's film to be a rather mind-numbing experience and I didn't really have high expectations for Emmerich's version either. Well, color me surprised because "White House Down" turned out to be better than I hoped it would be. Although overlong and downright silly, Emmerich's film manages to deliver as a dumb but fun summer action flick thanks to the enjoyable interplay between its two leads.

U.S. Capitol Police Officer John Cale (Channing Tatum) spends his nights protecting House of Representatives Speaker Eli Raphelson (Richard Jenkins) but dreams of becoming a Secret Service agent assigned to the Presidential Detail. He manages to sweet-talk a White House aide named Jenna (Jackie Geary) into pulling some strings and successfully lands an interview with Carol Finnerty (Maggie Gyllenhaal), the Director of the U.S. Secret Service. Unfortunately, Cale's application is rejected due to his problems with authority and lack of responsibility. Not wanting to disappoint his estranged daughter Emily (Joey King), he lies that he 'has a shot' at getting the job. On a whim, Cale takes Emily on a tour of the White House as she is an avid follower of American politics but their visit couldn't have come at a worse time. A paramilitary group led by ruthless mercenary Emil Stenz (Jason Clarke) infiltrates and takes over the White House, with President James Sawyer (Jamie Foxx) held hostage by veteran Presidential Detail leader Martin Walker (James Woods), who has turned traitor. Emily is separated from the tour group during the chaotic attack, forcing Cale to battle his way through the terrorists in order to save his daughter and the Chief Executive.

If "Die Hard with a Vengeance" and "Air Force One" got married and had a baby, it would look a lot like Roland Emmerich's "White House Down." The film is essentially a throwback to the blockbuster action pictures of the late 1980s and 1990s, and once again, Emmerich displays his penchant for blowing up American landmarks, particularly the White House (this marks his third time but who's counting?). Given how similar they are, it's inevitable that comparisons to "Olympus Has Fallen" will be made but at least Emmerich tries to create a sense of plausibility by having the terrorists (who are surprisingly not foreigners in a nice change of pace) utilize an 'inside man' within the Secret Service rather than resorting to an unbelievable brute force attack. Of course, there are some eye-rolling moments, such as when a hacker breaks through the U.S. firewall by literally pressing the number keys one through nine while listening to Beethoven. James Vanderbilt's script takes quite a number of cues from John McTiernan's "Die Hard," such as setting the action in one location and giving the main hero a strained relationship with one of his family members. Of course, that family member eventually gets taken hostage, providing the hero with the necessary motivation and emotional attachment from the audience to make the film work. In that regard, the story is rather derivative and delivers very few surprises but the material is thankfully elevated by the buddy chemistry between Channing Tatum and Jamie Foxx. The two actors are clearly having fun in their roles and what makes this film better than Antoine Fuqua's is that it doesn't take itself too seriously. Their banter is reminiscent of Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson in "Die Hard with a Vengeance," only they're not at each other's throats all the time. Presidents are often depicted as either very stoic or very solemn in Hollywood films but Foxx behaves unlike any President I've seen and I have to say, I enjoyed it. This guy's running around kicking terrorists in the face with his Air Jordan's and even wields a rocket launcher at one point during one of the film's most ridiculous action scene set on the White House lawn! It's all appropriately cheesy and I mean this in the best possible way.

Vanderbilt's script may be nothing more than a hodgepodge of action movie clichés from the 90s but his economical approach to storytelling does ensure that no line of dialogue is wasted. When a White House tour guide mentions a seemingly frivolous factoid about the historic building, it actually sets up a plot element that later comes into play, lending the film a logical consistency even if it is far from what we would call reality. Emmerich's tight handle on the action and where each set-piece takes place creates a nice sense of flow, which is helped by the accurate recreation of the White House by set designers Marie-Soleil Dénommé and Paul Hotte. Unfortunately, the action scenes, particularly the various shootouts that Cale finds himself in, are rather generic. They're competently staged but ultimately aren't all that imaginative, with the violence all bloodless due to its PG-13 rating. Emmerich is clearly more at home when he's destroying something, like demolishing Capitol Hill or firing a nuke at Air Force One. The various visual effects are good, if somewhat behind the curve for a film budgeted at $150 million, although we also have to take into account that it's only fourteen months from script to release. I'm frankly amazed it's coming out so soon!

A film like "White House Down" isn't really meant to showcase one's acting abilities but the performances here are more than satisfactory thanks to the talented cast Emmerich has assembled. Channing Tatum looks credible as an action hero and shares an excellent rapport with Jamie Foxx. The way they play off each other keeps the film light and fun despite the often dark subject matter. Although relegated to sitting behind a computer screen at the Pentagon (or a facsimile of it), Maggie Gyllenhaal and Richard Jenkins manage to lend some weight to their roles and prevent the tension from deflating. Jason Clarke snarls for the camera as vengeful mercenary Emil Stenz while James Woods pretty much chews the scenery as Secret Service agent-turned-traitor Martin Walker. However, it is thirteen-year-old Joey King that makes the most memorable impression as she adds a human face to the film and keeps it from being overwhelmed by all the action and silly banter.

"White House Down" won't be released until June 28, 2013, which makes this one of the first reviews you'll read on the film. Columbia Pictures/Sony had just started screening it this past week and the initial buzz has been positive, with many calling it a fun summer popcorn movie. Critics aren't exactly the biggest fans of Roland Emmerich but it's likely this film will land just slightly on the positive side at 60% on Rotten Tomatoes. It surely can't be worse than 2008's "10,000 B.C." or even "Godzilla." Box office wise, it's competing with Paul Feig's buddy cop comedy "The Heat" and although both are action films featuring buddy elements, they're fortunately aimed at different demographics, which will prevent them from cannibalizing each other. A final tally of $100 million is already a given for "White House Down" and it should turn a solid profit once worldwide grosses are factored in. Sometimes you just want to sit down and watch a film where you don't have to think too much, and thankfully Emmerich's latest more than fits that bill. You could definitely do a lot worse than this film.

Final Rating: 3.5 out of 5

"Ow! Could you not hit me in the head with a rocket while I'm trying to drive?!"   

Friday, June 14, 2013

Man of Steel 3D Review

Rated PG-13 (Intense Sequences of Sci-Fi Violence, Action and Destruction, and for Some Language)

Running Time: 2 Hours & 23 Minutes

Cast-
Henry Cavill-Kal-El/Clark Kent/Superman
Amy Adams-Lois Lane
Michael Shannon-General Zod
Kevin Costner-Jonathan Kent
Diane Lane-Martha Kent
Laurence Fishburne-Perry White
Russell Crowe-Jor-El
Ayelet Zurer-Lara Lor-Van
Rebecca Buller-Jenny Olson
Antje Traue-Faora-Ul
Mackenzie Gray-Jax-Ur
Christopher Meloni-Colonel Nathan Hardy
Harry Lennix-General Swanwick
Richard Schiff-Dr. Emil Hamilton

Directed by Zack Snyder

Zack Snyder, Christopher Nolan, and David Goyer reinvent Superman for the 21st century in "Man of Steel."
Note: Screened on Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at AMC Empire 25.

A man, a hero, a savior…an icon. I still remember the first time I laid eyes on Superman, like it was yesterday. In an attempt to keep me from running around the house and potentially hurting myself, my mom popped in a VHS tape (boy, I feel really old) containing Max Fleischer's classic "Superman" animated short films that were released during the early 1940s. I was immediately entranced and much to my mom's bemusement, I started to imitate Superman flying using one of my dad's old shirts as a makeshift cape. Not long after, I got my first Superman comic and yes, I remember the exact issue: Superman #74. Set during the much-hyped "Doomsday" storyline, the cover featured our titular hero using his heat vision against the monstrous brute while the bodies of several Justice League members lie at their feet, defeated. Marking the beginning of my ever-growing comic book collection, the rest (as they say) is history.

Of course, my introduction to Superman would not be complete if I didn't mention the Christopher Reeve films. The first two (released in 1978 and 1981) are instant classics and despite having seen them countless times, they still continue to resonate and leave me in a state of wide-eyed wonder. Just hearing John Williams' famous theme gives me chills. Even when the series began its decline in quality, Reeve's sincere and earnest portrayal of the Man of Steel remained a consistent highlight. Unfortunately, 1987's "Superman IV: The Quest for Peace" left such a bad taste in everyone's mouths that the franchise was effectively killed off for the next nineteen years! Bryan Singer tried to revive the character for the big screen with 2006's "Superman Returns," a loose sequel to "Superman II." Although it received largely positive reviews (76% on Rotten Tomatoes), the film failed to connect with audiences despite grossing $391 million worldwide. Much has changed in the past thirty-five years in regards to the comic book film and the unerring idealism exemplified by a character like Superman just seemed antiquated to many people. So Warner Brothers decided to take the Batman route and reboot the whole franchise. What's interesting is that the architects behind this new vision were none other than David S. Goyer and Christopher Nolan, who reinvented Batman for the modern era with their recently concluded "Dark Knight" trilogy. Nolan, however, opted to serve as producer only and left the reins of the film to Zack Snyder, who directed the fan-favorite "300" and the highly-underrated "Watchmen." It's been a long journey for us Superman fans and I have to admit to feeling a bit apprehensive as the release of "Man of Steel" drew near. Well, those worries are now completely gone because this reboot is an unqualified success. A grandiose, operatic spectacle that is as exciting as it is moving, "Man of Steel" knocks it out of the park with its reinvention of one of the most enduring American icons of all time.

A dire environmental crisis has left the planet Krypton on the verge of destruction, forcing the brilliant scientist Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and his wife Lara (Ayelet Zurer) to send their infant son Kal-El, the civilization's first natural-born child in centuries, to Earth along with their world's Codex, which can be used to create a new Krypton. Meanwhile, General Zod (Michael Shannon) tries to overthrow the Kryptonian Council in an attempt to save the planet but his efforts are thwarted. He and his compatriots, led by Faora (Antje Traue), are imprisoned in the Phantom Zone for their crimes, with Zod swearing to find Jor-El's child and the Codex when his sentence is complete. Krypton is soon destroyed and Kal-El's ship lands in Smallville, Kansas, where he is adopted by Jonathan (Kevin Costner) and Martha Kent (Diane Lane). Kal-El is given a new name, Clark (Henry Cavill), who grows up to be a troubled young man drifting from one job to the next in search of purpose. Out of fear of humanity's reprisal, he keeps his powers a secret but cannot resist using them to help others. This draws the attention of Daily Planet reporter Lois Lane (Amy Adams), who sets out across the country to learn more about this mysterious hero. Their meeting coincides with the reappearance Zod, freed from his prison in the wake of Krypton's destruction. Donning his father's symbol as 'Superman,' Clark is soon forced to make a difficult choice, with the fate of the Earth hanging in the balance.

You know you're watching a special film when it moves you to tears in the first fifteen minutes. "Man of Steel" opens with the birth of Kal-El and even before the image fades in, we already hear his mother Lara crying out in pain, with the baby's thumping heartbeat heard in the background. This marks a significant moment in Krypton's history as it is the first natural-birth to occur in centuries. On Krypton, babies are engineered and who they become as adults is written into their genetic code. To naturally conceive a child is not only unheard of, it is considered heresy. The element of choice, that a person's fate and destiny lies in their own hands, frightens the rest of Krypton because it is different; it is an unknown variable that cannot be controlled. Right off the bat, it's clear that "Man of Steel" is an entirely different beast from the Richard Donner picture that we all grew up with. The earnest optimism that Donner brought to the character has been replaced with a somber and melancholy tone, and one of the more noticeable changes is the emotional weight the imminent destruction of Krypton brings. Lara's final good-bye to her son and the subsequent planetary cataclysm that follows will not only bring a lump to your throat, it'll leave you stunned into silence.

The actual crash-landing of Kal-El's ship is not shown; instead it cuts to the present just when it is about to impact into a certain cornfield in Smallville. It is here that we are introduced to Clark Kent, a drifter moving from one job to the next, never staying in one place for too long. Although Zack Snyder is the director, Christopher Nolan's influence is felt throughout as the story is told in a non-linear fashion, with flashbacks frequently employed to fill in Clark's childhood and the difficult journey he is on. Superman is one of the most difficult characters to adapt on film because his god-like status robs him of any drama. To reintroduce him for a modern audience, Snyder, Nolan, and Goyer (taking inspiration from Mark Waid and Leinil Francis Yu's 2003 twelve-part mini-series Superman: Birthright) adopt the same approach with "Batman Begins"—break down the character to his bare essentials and then rebuild him from there. The Clark Kent we meet at the beginning of the film is at a crossroads and unsure of what his purpose in life is, with the manifestation of his powers more of a curse than a blessing. Fearing for his son's well-being, his adopted father tells him to hide in plain sight because the consequences could be disastrous if he reveals himself. There's a flashback that finds the Kent family in the midst of a tornado and immediately, Pa Kent jumps into action, directing everyone to find shelter. However, he is injured while going back for the family dog and Clark is just about to rush over to save him when he calmly reaches out and silently nods to his son to stop. It's a truly heartbreaking moment and even writing about it now makes me feel emotional. There's always a personal human stake that grounds Clark and we identify with the way tragedy has shaped much of his life.

It is only when Clark finds a derelict ship from his homeworld (buried in the ice for centuries) that he starts to evolve into the Superman that we know but even then, it's not a walk in the park. Most of the time he's relying on his gut feeling and the moral principles that Pa Kent instilled in him while also trying to reconcile with the 'destiny' that Jor-El has set for him. When Superman made his grand entrance in Donner's film, the people of Metropolis celebrate and cheer him on. They accept him without question. In "Man of Steel," the American public (and the rest of the world) reacts with suspicion, even fear, with the military treating Superman as the first of many alien invaders. This is someone who wields immense power and the thought of us not being alone in the universe is terrifying because it is something completely out of our control. "Man of Steel" then evolves into a journey of acceptance and it's only fitting because Superman is essentially an immigrant who is literally torn between two worlds. It is this aspect that resonated with me the most and what I took away from this film is that even the person with the most humble beginnings can accomplish greatness. Superman represents an ideal that we strive for; he inspires us to do better both for ourselves and for others as well. These are the qualities that Snyder nails in his film and by the time the end credits rolled, I was not only convinced that a man can fly but that we needed a Superman in our world, to serve as a reminder of what we can achieve if we put aside all our differences and work together.

A common complaint of the previous "Superman" films has been their lack of action. Well, rest assured you're going to get your fill here. What's impressive about "Man of Steel" is the sheer scale of it all. Take the opening scene on Krypton for instance. The imagination and creativity that was poured into realizing this planet is astounding as we watch Jor-El ride a giant winged beast while a civil war rages all around him. It creates a palpable sense of desperation in his actions. The majority of the fights occur in the last forty or so minutes of the film and words cannot even do it justice. Each battle builds on top of each other as these god-like beings trade blows and cause untold amounts of destruction, making the Chitauri and the Decepticons look like sock puppets in comparison. The pacing is relentless, with Clark tested not just physically but morally as well. The finale will definitely be a source of major debate. Visuals and CG work are often dazzling, aided by Amir Mokri's rich and moody cinematography but the handheld, Terrence Malick-like camerawork that Snyder employs can get downright distracting at times, especially during dialogue scenes. To no one's surprise, Hans Zimmer's score is excellent and certainly ranks as one of the composer's best work. It's adrenaline-pumping and emotionally moving in all the right moments. The only major drawback is the 3D. This is a post-conversion and while it's far from terrible, the added effect fails to really enhance the experience. There's some nice use of depth here and there (particularly during the Krypton scenes) but little actually 'pops out' despite all the debris flying in our faces. You're better off saving your money and seeing it in good ol' 2D.

Snyder has taken a rather unorthodox approach in regards to his cast. Like Donner and Singer before him, he has chosen a relative unknown for the role of Clark Kent/Superman in the form of British actor Henry Cavill. Pretty much the entire film rests on his performance and you know what? He absolutely nails it and not once did I think of Christopher Reeve. Cavill at times may come off as too stoic but that's because much of what Clark is going through is internalized. This is a Superman who's not quite sure of his place in the world and you really feel that sense of longing to be accepted through Cavill. Some will find this insecure and introspective take of the character to be tedious but this is exactly what we need considering how much Superman has been turned into a joke in the eyes of the Average Joe. It reflects the uncertain world we now live in while Reeve harkens back to a simpler time where good is good and evil is evil. I've always felt Lois Lane was the harder character to cast compared to Superman. Although adequate in "Superman Returns," Kate Bosworth was just too young to pull off the role of a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist. When Amy Adams was chosen to play Superman's famous love interest (trading a brunette for a redhead), I knew she would be perfect for the role and she doesn't disappoint. Adams' Lois is fearless and compassionate, and I love how the film already has her actively searching for Clark and trying to connect all the dots with this mysterious Good Samaritan. While we do see that initial romantic spark between them, this is not a Lois and Clark story. In fact, most of the romance elements are downplayed in favor of focusing on Clark's journey. However, Snyder does leave their relationship at an interesting place, setting up a very promising direction for future installments.

A hero is only as good as its villain and Michael Shannon is another inspired piece of casting. Terrence Stamp was brilliant as General Zod in "Superman II" but it was due to his performance. The character wasn't given much motivation beyond his hatred for the House of El for imprisoning him in the Phantom Zone. Shannon's Zod is not wholly evil; he only wants to save his people because that was the role he was given. He knows that his tactics are extreme but if it means the survival of his race, than the ends justify the means. What sets Shannon apart from Stamp is the way he makes Zod a sympathetic character even when he's willing to commit genocide. His actions are noble, his methods are not and that's where his conflict with Clark stems from. Equally as memorable is Antje Traue's Faora. At least Zod has a sense of morality, twisted as it may be; Faora is pure chaos and her throw-down with Superman is intense and brutal, by far one of the most memorable set-pieces in the film. The rest of the supporting cast is quite good, although some of them feel marginalized once the action gets going. Russell Crowe brings a sense of gravitas to Jor-El and no, this is not a glorified cameo like the one Marlon Brando gave. He actually has quite a lot of screen-time and even his own action scene! Diane Lane and Kevin Costner are absolutely wonderful as Clark's adoptive parents, with their performances imbuing the film with emotional poignancy. Unfortunately, they don't appear as much as they should, with Costner limited to flashback scenes. Laurence Fishburne is great as well as Daily Planet editor Perry White but his character has very little bearing on the story besides providing a human face during Superman's clash with Zod.

Released on June 14, 2013, "Man of Steel" has rather dismayingly received a mixed reception with 58% on Rotten Tomatoes. I have to admit, I am completely taken aback by all the negative reviews. Many of the complaints have centered on the film being a humorless affair, which is just not true. There are definitely some funny bits but when the Earth is about to be destroyed by a terraforming machine, it's hard to joke about that. It seems that critics aren't quite ready to let go of the Christopher Reeve films. The problem is that the audience of today is much different compared to the audience thirty-five years ago. "Superman Returns" was a great film but it wasn't the Superman people wanted. "Man of Steel" is the Superman that we deserve and if the reaction from Tuesday's advance screening is anything to go by, this film is going to open huge at the box office and possibly even set a new opening record for June. When Snyder, Nolan, and Goyer set out to reboot America's first superhero, they faced a daunting task yet they managed to succeed and the reason "Man of Steel" succeeds is because they took the character seriously. With the foundation now set, the future certainly looks bright for Superman…and for the first time in over twenty years, I'm excited to be a fan of him once more.

Final Rating: 4.5 out of 5

"You will give the people an ideal to strive towards. They will race behind you, they will stumble, they will fall. But in time, they will join you in the sun. In time, you will help them accomplish wonders."

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

The Great Gatsby (2013) 3D Review

Rated PG-13 (Some Violent Images, Sexual Content, Smoking, Partying and Brief Language)

Running Time: 2 Hours & 22 Minutes

Cast-
Leonardo DiCaprio-Jay Gatsby
Tobey Maguire-Nick Carraway
Carey Mulligan-Daisy Buchanan
Joel Edgerton-Tom Buchanan
Elizabeth Debicki-Jordan Baker
Isla Fisher-Myrtle Wilson
Jason Clarke-George Wilson
Amitabh Bachchan-Meyer Wolfsheim
Adelaide Clemens-Catherine
Jack Thompson-Dr. Walter Perkins

Directed by Baz Luhrmann

Leonardo DiCaprio and Carey Mulligan star in Baz Luhrmann's "The Great Gatsby," the fourth adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald's eponymous novel.
Note: At AMC Empire 25.

I was a voracious reader during my elementary and middle school years. Since I didn't have much to do at home, I needed an activity that would help pass the time but once I got to high school, I began reading less and less. When you're inundated with homework that's due the very next day, reading for pleasure just didn't seem all that productive, especially when you also had assigned books to read. I often found those books to be rather 'boring' to my easily-distracted teenage mind and a common sight was me falling asleep in English class. Thankfully, age has granted me the hindsight to truly appreciate the works of literature that my instructors assigned me to read and among these works was none other than F. Scott Fitzgerald's magnum opus, The Great Gatsby.

Written over a three-month period and published in 1925, The Great Gatsby was only a mere 176 pages but the words within held enormous power. Capturing the zeitgeist of the Roaring Twenties, Fitzgerald's novel told of the doomed love affair between the mysterious Jay Gatsby and wealthy debutante Daisy Buchanan yet this wasn't a simple romance tale; it was an indictment of the American Dream and how it had been corrupted by easy money and material excess. Unfortunately, the reviews at the time were very mixed and Fitzgerald sadly passed away in 1940 (at only age 44) under the belief that he was a failure. Nowadays, The Great Gatsby is widely regarded as a literary classic and is commonly referred to as the 'Great American Novel.' With over 25 million copies sold worldwide, it's no surprise that Hollywood wanted to make a film adaptation. The most famous version is the one released in 1974 starring Robert Redford as the titular Gatsby and Mia Farrow as Daisy Buchanan. Directed by Jack Clayton with a script from Francis Ford Coppola, the film failed to impress critics, with many viewing it as dull and lifeless. Roger Ebert wrote in his review that it was 'faithful to the novel with a vengeance [but] not to the feel, mood, and spirit of it.' Now we have another adaptation (the fourth), courtesy of Australian director Baz Luhrmann. A visual feast for the eyes, Luhrmann's "Great Gatsby" remains faithful to its revered source material but like the 1974 version before it, he fails to capture the spirit of Fitzgerald's work and instead turns it into a melodramatic, overblown soap opera.

Hoping to make it big as a bond salesman in Wall Street, Midwesterner Nick Carraway (Tobey Maguire) relocates to the (fictional) village of West Egg in Long Island, New York during the summer of 1922, where he rents a small cottage next to the lavish mansion owned by the enigmatic Jay Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio). Rumors abound about Gatsby's past and where his fortune came from but one thing's for sure: the man knows how to throw a party. After spending a drunken night with his college acquaintance Tom Buchanan (Joel Edgerton), Nick arrives home to find a personal invite to one of Gatsby's parties, having been the only one to ever receive a direct invitation as all the other guests simply just show up and indulge themselves. At the party, Nick tries to find Gatsby but discovers to his surprise that no one has ever met him. He encounters Jordan Baker (Elizabeth Debicki), an amateur golfer and friend of his cousin Daisy (Carey Mulligan), who happens to be Tom's wife. They finally manage to meet their host after much trouble, with the mysterious millionaire taking an immediate liking to Nick. Through Jordan, Nick learns that Gatsby was once romantically involved with Daisy five years ago when he was serving in the military during World War I. Still madly in love with her, Gatsby wants Nick to arrange a meeting between him and Daisy. Nick agrees and invites his cousin to tea at his house without telling her that Gatsby will also be there. Gatsby and Daisy initially share an awkward reunion but the two quickly rekindle their romance and embark on a secret love affair. This arouses the suspicion of Tom, who is also involved in an extramarital affair with Myrtle Wilson (Isla Fisher), the wife of sickly gas station attendant George (Jason Clarke).

Fully embracing his 'Go big or go home' mentality, Baz Luhrmann's "Great Gatsby" is nothing short of visually spectacular. The decadent excess of the Jazz Age has been amped up to infinity as millions of confetti bombards the screen during Gatsby's extravagant parties while the guests cavort in an orgiastic celebration of money and booze. It is in these moments that the film truly comes alive with its frenzied editing, zooming camera, and anachronistic soundtrack (spearheaded by Shawn 'Jay Z' Carter, who also serves as executive producer). By the time Gatsby appears thirty minutes in, fireworks are exploding behind him while the climax of George Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue surges in the background. It's a magnificent entrance that really sticks with you. Obviously, this gaudy, almost cartoon-like vision of 1920's New York is not true-to-life but Luhrmann was never known for his subtlety. The word doesn't even exist in his vocabulary. From top-to-bottom, the opulent production design from Catherine Martin (also Luhrmann's wife) is an orgasm for the eyes, and this is one film that truly benefits from 3D. You're not experiencing "The Great Gatsby" as intended if you go see this in 2D since the extra effect adds to the immersion factor with its kaleidoscopic glitz and glamour.

Unfortunately, I can't lavish the same praise on the film's story. Told in a framed narrative while Nick is in a mental institution, Luhrmann remains faithful to Fitzgerald's work (sometimes a little too faithful), with many passages taken verbatim from the novel. The problem is that he has failed to translate the spirit of the source material to the big screen and not helping is the uneven pacing, with the film lurching along in fits and spurts while being overtaken in a tidal wave of overcooked emotions. The Great Gatsby was about the corruption of the American Dream and the hollowness of the upper class. Throughout the novel, Gatsby is chasing an idealized version of Daisy, showering her with love and affection when she is totally undeserving of it, just like how the American people were no longer deserving of the American Dream with the easy accessibility of money and their material excess. Luhrmann does explore this but it comes across as a meaningless sentiment when he keeps playing up the romance angle between Gatsby and Daisy. In his mind, Gatsby is nothing but a pure-hearted victim whom Daisy loved unconditionally. It all feels like "Romeo and Juliet 2" with the star-crossed lovers who are meant to be together but are unable to due to their social upbringing. Dramatic moments, such as when Tom confronts Gatsby over the source of his wealth at the Plaza Hotel, are reduced to melodramatic soap opera. Some of the symbols from the novel (the green light, the faded eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg) also feel heavy-handed, with Luhrmann literally screaming at us to 'look, this is a symbol!' There's no denying that "The Great Gatsby" is a visual spectacle but its missing the heart of Fitzgerald's novel. In fact, he probably would've been turned off by all this shiny pizzazz if he was still alive today.

Luhrmann has certainly gathered an impressive cast yet their performances come across as very one-note, with the exception of Leonardo DiCaprio. As the titular Jay Gatsby, the actor is simply magnetic in the role, capturing not just the character's unyielding optimism and mysterious charm but also his painful longing. Carey Mulligan, however, feels like a damsel-in-distress caught between two men as opposed to the shallow, self-absorbed debutante in the novel. Tobey Maguire is fine but he's given very little to do besides observe, with his narration often feeling intrusive and unnecessary. Joel Edgerton reduces Tom Buchanan to growling, mustache-twirling villainy while Elizabeth Debicki's Jordan Baker is pretty much a blank. Rounding out the cast is Isla Fisher and Jason Clarke, who are basically non-entities despite their characters' importance in the story.

Released on May 10, 2013 (after being pushed back from its original December release last year), "The Great Gatsby" has received mixed reviews with 50% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics noted that it was 'certainly ambitious—and every bit as visually dazzling as one might expect [but Luhrmann] emphasizes visual splendor at the expense of its source material's vibrant heart.' Warner Brothers made a very wise choice in delaying its release for an extra five months as the original date would've been too competitive. Marketing it as a summer event picture resulted in a very impressive $50.1 million debut despite heavy competition from Marvel's "Iron Man 3." With $278.8 million worldwide, the film is already a resounding success, especially for a romantic drama. Luhrmann's "Great Gatsby" is quite a sight to behold with its gorgeous visuals but by focusing so much on how it looks, he completely misses the point of Fitzgerald's novel. A more appropriate title for this film would be "The Mediocre Gatsby."

Final Rating: 2.5 out of 5

"Can't repeat the past? No, why, of course you can...of course you can."