Friday, June 8, 2012

Prometheus 3D Review

Rated R (Sci-Fi Violence including some Intense Images, and Brief Language)

Running Time: 2 Hours & 4 Minutes

Cast-
Noomi Rapace-Dr. Elizabeth Shaw
Logan Marshall-Green-Dr. Charlie Holloway
Charlize Theron-Meredith Vickers
Michael Fassbender-David
Idris Elba-Captain Janek
Guy Pearce-Peter Weyland
Kate Dickie-Dr. Ford
Rafe Spall-Millburn
Sean Harris-Fifield
Benedict Wong-Ravel
Emun Elliott-Chance
Patrick Wilson-Shaw's Father
Ian Whyte-The Engineer

Directed by Ridley Scott

Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace), Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), and David (Michael Fassbender) explore humanity's origins in Ridley Scott's "Prometheus."
Note: This review may contain some unintentional spoilers.

‘You still don't understand what you're dealing with, do you? A perfect organism. Its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility. I admire its purity. A survivor...unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality.’ Thirty-three years ago in 1979, director Ridley Scott unleashed one of the most memorable and terrifying menaces we hope to never encounter in space with his science fiction/horror masterpiece “Alien.” Although the film was initially met with a mixed reception from critics, it went on to achieve lasting critical acclaim and rocketed then-unknown actress Sigourney Weaver to superstardom. Roger Ebert stated in his review that ‘one of the great strengths of [the film] is its pacing. It takes its time. It waits. It allows silences. It suggests the enormity of the crew's discovery by building up to it with small steps.’ Seven years later in 1986, the sequel “Aliens” was released with James Cameron at the helm. In contrast to Scott’s focus on a slow-burn atmosphere seeped in suspense and dread, Cameron opted for all-out action instead. “Aliens” holds the rare distinction of being more critically acclaimed than its predecessor, with 100% on Rotten Tomatoes. Unfortunately, the franchise began to lose its way by the third installment and constant interference from 20th Century Fox led to David Fincher outright disowning “Alien 3,” which was released in 1992. I honestly found it to be an underrated film and the ‘Assembly Cut’ alleviates many of the problems that plagued the theatrical version, which was edited without the participation of Fincher. 1997’s “Alien Resurrection” proved to be the death knell of the franchise and the iconic Xenomorphs would lie dormant until 2004’s “Alien vs. Predator” and 2007’s “Aliens vs. Predator Requiem,” which did little except damage the brand even further. 

Development of a fifth “Alien” film stretched as far back as 2002 with Scott expressing interest to return to the franchise he created in order to explore the origins of the Xenomorphs and the mysterious ‘Space Jockey,’ a deceased extraterrestrial being who briefly appears in the original film as the pilot of a derelict spaceship. Announced as an untitled prequel to “Alien” in 2009, Scott initially had no interest to direct and hand-picked Carl Erik Rinsch, whose work was primarily in commercials, to helm the film while he would serve as producer instead. The project stalled as 20th Century Fox was adamant that Scott direct and he finally relented after a few months of hand-wrangling. The initial script from Jon Spaihts was more-or-less a straight prequel but once Damon Lindelof was hired to perform rewrites, it ‘evolved [into] a new, grand mythology and universe in which this original story takes place.’ “Prometheus” finally arrives into theaters after such an agonizing wait and while its expanded scope leads to a somewhat clumsy narrative and marginalized characters, the film remains a fine return to form for Ridley Scott thanks to its haunting visuals, philosophical musings, and compelling performances—especially from Michael Fassbender as the mysterious android David. 

In the distant past, a pale humanoid alien consumes a strange compound that causes its body to disintegrate, seeding the planet with its DNA while a spaceship hovers above. Fast forward to the year 2089, an archeologist couple, Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), discover a 35,000 year old cave painting of a star map on the Isle of Skye, Scotland. This star map was also found among several unconnected ancient cultures, leading to Shaw to theorize that it as an invitation from an extraterrestrial race she dubs ‘Engineers,’ the forerunners of humanity. Using the star maps as a guide, Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce), the elderly founder of Weyland Corporation, funds a scientific expedition to the distant moon LV-223. The starship Prometheus, with a crew of seventeen led by Captain Janek (Idris Elba), arrives at the moon in 2093 to search for any signs of the Engineers but mission director Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron) explains to Shaw and Holloway to not initiate any contact if they are found. Accompanying the crew is an android named David (Michael Fassbender) who attends to the ship’s day-to-day activities. Prometheus lands near a dome-like structure and a team that includes Shaw, Holloway, and David is sent out to explore it with the aid of small drones to map out the interior. Inside is a mausoleum filled with strange murals, several stone containers, and a monolithic statue of a humanoid head. The team also finds the decapitated body of an Engineer and retrieves its head to bring back to the ship. As the crew further investigates, it soon becomes clear that the intentions of the Engineers were far from benign and that their discovery not only has deadly repercussions for Earth, but for all of humanity as well. 

There has been much confusion about whether “Prometheus” is a prequel to “Alien” and while there are several references to Ridley Scott’s own 1979 classic, it is largely a stand-alone affair. Scott took a minimalist approach to the story in “Alien” and focused on building suspense in what was essentially a battle of survival between a starship’s small crew and a parasitic life-form that only lived to further propagate its own species to destructive effect. While some of those elements have been retained, “Prometheus” aims bigger to avoid being a simple retread and functions as Scott’s own version of “2001: A Space Odyssey.” In fact, both films begin with effectively the same shot and explore similar existential concepts on creation, evolution, and humanity’s place in the universe. There’s even a scene where David goes about his routine (riding a bike and playing basketball) while the crew of the Prometheus are in hyper-sleep, a homage to Frank Poole enjoying a jog on Discovery One. “Prometheus” functions as a tale of children (humanity) meeting face-to-face with their maker (the Engineers) and the antagonistic relationship they share but the question is why. In Greek mythology, the Titan Prometheus stole and gave humanity the gift of fire but was subsequently punished by Zeus, who bound the Titan to a rock and had an eagle consume his liver every day. Representing the unintended consequences of exceeding one’s grasp, the Engineers’ hatred of humanity may stem from a fear of their ‘children’ surpassing them one day. It is also interesting to note the parallels between the crew’s cavalier attitude toward David and the Engineers’ anger at humanity. Of course all this is speculation but while the film’s philosophical musings are welcome, very few concrete answers are provided and this will prove to be the most frustrating aspect for casual audiences who were expecting a straight-forward science fiction film. In trying to explore as many themes and ideas as possible, the narrative in “Prometheus” ends up being somewhat jumbled with character development being marginalized. Yet as flawed as the script may be, I admire the fact that Scott and his writers took a chance rather than play it safe, something that is sorely lacking in Hollywood right now. These issues fall by the wayside once you begin to take in the film’s haunting visuals, with one of the highlights being the holographic star map that David finds deep within the bowels of the Engineer’s ship. Scott’s use of digital effects serve as a reminder of the difference a talented director can make compared to a hack like Michael Bay, who bombards the viewer with an incoherent mess of CG. The cinematography from Dariusz Wolski combined with the impeccable production design of Arthur Max creates this incredibly textured world that offer hints of the horror that lies underneath the ruins of LV-223. 

Scott hasn’t forgotten about the horror aspects that made “Alien” a classic and there are several scenes that will leave you gripping your seat, including a gruesome surgery performed on Shaw that gives new meaning to Caesarean section. Many of the classic creatures in “Alien” have been reverse-engineered for “Prometheus” but they retain the fetishistic sexual imagery found in the work of Swiss surrealist painter H.R. Giger, who designed the murals glimpsed in the beginning of the film. As for whether an actual Xenomorph appears in the film, the answer is no but something does appear at the end that left my jaw hanging. The score from Marc Streitenfeld isn’t as memorable compared to Jerry Goldsmith’s but it helped enhance the foreboding atmosphere of the film, especially during the more suspenseful scenes. I was initially very skeptical of the 3D despite “Prometheus” being shot with Red Epic 3D cameras as much of the film takes place in dark environments with minimal lighting. Fortunately, Scott compensates for the dimming effect that comes with wearing 3D glasses as the film retains a stunningly bright clarity yet it never feels artificial as the darkness actually feels dark. The amount of depth that fills every scene is amazing and really makes the sets come alive despite the fact that this is the first time Scott has used 3D. He doesn’t engage in any gimmicks by having objects ‘pop out’ but this subtle use of 3D is perfectly balanced: it immerses the viewer but does not distract them. 

The performances are believable and Noomi Rapace (the original girl with the dragon tattoo) makes for a fine heroine. She’s no Ellen Ripley but she instills Elizabeth Shaw with indomitable survival instinct that comes in handy during the second half of the film. Most of the characters aren’t developed beyond their basic personality traits such as Charlize Theron’s icy turn as corporate lackey Meredith Vickers or Idris Elba’s world-weary Captain Janek. Scott also throws in a few bickering crew members with Rafe Spall’s Millburn and Sean Harris’s Fifield, a nice nod to Brett and Parker in the original “Alien.” The standout is Michael Fassbender, an actor who continuously delivers one excellent performance after another, whatever the genre may be. On the outside, Fassbender’s David feels stiff but there are a lot of emotions underneath. There’s both a vulnerable and a treacherous side to his character, one who wants to help his human creators but also prove to them that he is superior. I know his fans were disappointed that he was snubbed for an Academy Award nomination but you know what, Fassbender does not need some statue to validate his talent as long as he keeps delivering performances like these. 

“Prometheus” was released on June 8, 2012 to positive reviews with 74% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics found that ‘Ridley Scott's ambitious quasi-prequel to Alien may not answer all of its big questions, but it's redeemed by its haunting visual grandeur and compelling performances—particularly Michael Fassbender as a fastidious android.’ I saw “Prometheus” at an advanced screening (strangely sponsored by Coors Light Beer) and most of the audience was absorbed with the film, although there were some hecklers who couldn’t keep their mouths closed. Some of the reactions I’ve been reading have been mixed and opinions are largely divided. To inspire such fervent discussion is both the film’s main strength and weakness; it keeps it in the public consciousness longer but will frustrate many, and some will likely just throw up their arms and give up. While “Prometheus” can be too ambiguous, I enjoy films that make you think about what you’ve seen and what type of meaning the director is striving for. Keep in mind that the original “Alien” was not well-received upon release as well. As for the box office, I have feeling that it’s going to settle for second place given the R-rating but it is tracking for a debut of at least $50 million and has already earned $46 million internationally. “Prometheus” has its flaws but the film remains thought-provoking and visually striking, serving as a reminder that in the vast coldness of space, no one can hear you scream.

Final Rating: 4.5 out of 5

“Big things have small beginnings.”

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted 3D Review

Rated PG (Some Mild Action and Rude Humor)

Running Time: 1 Hour & 25 Minutes

Cast (voice):
Ben Stiller-Alex the Lion
Chris Rock-Marty the Zebra
David Schwimmer-Melman the Giraffe
Jade Pinkett Smith-Gloria the Hippopotamus
Sacha Baron Cohen-King Julien XIII the Lemur
Cedric Antonio Kyles-Maurice the Aye-Aye
Andy Richter-Mort the Lemur
Frances McDormand-Captain Chantel DuBois
Bryan Cranston-Vitaly the Tiger
Jessica Chastain-Gia the Jaguar
Martin Short-Stefano the Sea Lion
Tom McGrath-Skipper
Chris Miller-Kowalski
Christopher Knights-Private
John DiMaggio-Rico
Conrad Vernon-Mason the Chimpanzee

Directed by Eric Darnell, Tom McGrath, and Conrad Vernon 

Alex the Lion (Ben Stiller), Marty the Zebra (Chris Rock), Gloria the Hippopotamus (Jada Pinkett Smith), and Melman the Giraffe (David Schwimmer) find a new home among the circus in DreamWorks Animation's "Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted."
When it comes to CG animation, DreamWorks has always been more hit-and-miss compared to the consistent heights of Pixar, although last summer’s “Cars 2” was a dud with critics (38% on Rotten Tomatoes) despite earning $560 million worldwide, in addition to all the tie-in merchandise. The number of duds in DreamWorks Animation’s filmography dwarfs that of Pixar such as 2004’s disastrous “Shark Tale” and the latter two “Shrek” films, which were made to sell tickets rather than tell a legitimate story. The studio also tends to release two to three animated films per year compared to one per year for Pixar, accounting for the lower mark in quality. However, when DreamWorks gets it right, they really get it right with 2010’s “How to Train Your Dragon” rivaling the very best of Pixar. One of their more curious franchises is the “Madagascar” films, which have proven to be big moneymakers at the box office but have received lukewarm praise at best from critics. 2005’s “Madagascar” didn’t exactly leave the most positive impression with its blocky animation and flimsy story but the series improved with each successive installment, culminating with “Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted,” which pulls out all the stops to deliver the most visually dazzling entry to date and it’s hard not to get caught up in the film’s colorful energy despite the well-worn script and themes. 

Picking up immediately after the events of the previous film, Alex the Lion (Ben Stiller), Marty the Zebra (Chris Rock), Melman the Giraffe (David Schwimmer), and Gloria the Hippopotamus (Jada Pinkett Smith) have grown restless living in Africa and decide to finally make the journey back to the Central Park Zoo in New York City. Along with King Julien the Lemur (Sacha Baron Cohen), Maurice the Aye-Aye (Cedric Antonio Kyles) and the adorable Mort (Andy Richter), the quartet make their way to Monte Carlo, France to retrieve the Penguins, led by Skipper (Tom McGrath), and have him take them home on their patchwork plane. Meanwhile, the Penguins have spent their time gambling away their riches in various casinos with the aid of the chimpanzees. Alex and his friends arrive in Monte Carlo to commence ‘Operation Penguin Extraction’ but the plan goes horribly wrong and the animals find themselves chased by Captain Chantel DuBois (Frances McDormand), who wants Alex’s head mounted on her wall. The group manages to evade capture by falling in with circus troupe Zaragosa, which includes Vitaly the Tiger (Bryan Cranston), Gia the Jaguar (Jessica Chastain) and the flamboyant sea lion Stefano (Martin Short). They manage to convince them that they are circus animals as well but upon learning that Zaragosa might get to perform in New York City, the chimpanzees decide to buy the entire troupe from the owner. However, Zaragosa has seen better days and their show in Rome ends up being a disaster, with customers angrily demanding a refund. To have a chance at getting back home to New York City, Alex and his friends have to reinvent the circus into something totally unique! 

“Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted” does not reach the cinematic heights of Pixar’s films nor does it intend to as the film’s goal is to deliver a breezy sequel that can be enjoyed by children and to a lesser extent, adults. Moving at a quick but unrushed pace, the story from Eric Darnell and Noah Baumbach is adequate and mines some well-worn territory in regards to its themes of friendship, imparting the message that home does not have to be a specific place but what you make of it. Where this third (and supposedly final) entry shines is in its lively tone and colorful 3D visuals. It’s amazing how much the CG animation has improved since 2005. The comedy is of the slapstick variety and while none of it is particularly clever or original, it’s clear that the voice cast is having a lot of fun and their enthusiasm is clearly felt throughout the film. There are several standout set-pieces packed within its lean eighty-five minute running time such as a thrilling chase through the streets (and rooftops!) of Monte Carlo but the most memorable scene is when Alex debuts the new and improved Circus Zaragosa in London, setting off a dazzling sequence of Cirque du Soleil-inspired stunts while Katy Perry’s Fireworks plays in the background. “Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted” also features the best use of 3D I’ve ever seen in an animated film and the extra dimension really makes all the action come alive. I’m not the biggest advocate for 3D but if you don’t mind paying the extra surcharge, by all means do so because this is one of those rare times where it’s actually worth the expense. 

The celebrity voice cast is uniformly excellent, especially Chris Rock as Marty the Zebra, whose ‘Afro Circus’ song had me laughing in tears. Ben Stiller plays a more straight-man role as Alex the Lion and while they get to shine in a few scenes, Jada Pinkett Smith and David Schwimmer’s characters are ultimately underutilized. The additions to the cast are the real highlight, with a delightful Frances McDormand as the villainous Captain Chantel DuBois, who inspires her men with a brilliant rendition of Charles Dumont’s Non, Je Ne Regrette Rien. Bryan Cranston, Jessica Chastain, and Martin Short are virtually unrecognizable with their exaggerated accents, which is a good thing since it allows you to be more immersed with their characters. Celebrity voice casts can come off as a gimmick but it’s clear everyone enjoyed working on the film and this shows from their performances. 

“Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted” will be released on June 8, 2012 and has received positive reviews so far with a current score of 76% on Rotten Tomatoes, a marked improvement over the previous entries. I saw the film at an advanced screening (which required me to wake up at seven in the morning) and it wasn’t just the children who were having fun but also the adults as well. Before the screening began, we were treated to a nice dance routine to Reel 2 Real’s I Like to Move It. The only competition it faces is Ridley Scott’s “Prometheus” but being an R-rated film will limit its appeal despite the high anticipation from fans so I expect “Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted” to take the top spot this weekend with approximately $60 million. It won’t make you emotional compared to Pixar’s films but “Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted” is an irresistibly fun time at the movies thanks to its eclectic voice cast and bombastic 3D visuals.

Final Rating: 4 out of 5

“In order to get home, we will come up with an act that will blow everyone away!”

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

The Dictator Review

Rated R (Strong Crude and Sexual Content, Brief Male Nudity, Language and Some Violent Images)

Running Time: 1 Hour & 23 Minutes

Cast-
Sacha Baron Cohen-Admiral General Hafez Aladeen/Efawadh
Anna Faris-Zoey
Ben Kingsley-Uncle Tamir
Jason Mantzoukas-Nadal
John C. Reilly-Clayton
Bobby Lee-Mr. Lao
Megan Fox-As Herself
Edward Norton-As Himself

Directed by Larry Charles

Admiral General Aladeen (Sacha Baron Cohen) demands you to smell his finger!
One of my classmates had recently seen director Tom Six’s 2009 body-horror flick “The Human Centipede [First Sequence]” and during a conversation among his friends, he repeatedly referred to the character Katsuro played by Akihiro Kitamura as ‘the Chinese guy.’ I explained to him that Katsuro and the actor who played him were Japanese but still he would refer to him as Chinese! I soon got annoyed and yelled at him to correct his error, prompting him to respond that Asians ‘all look the same.’ It would be more accurate to say that some Asians look similar, not the same. India is part of Asia but its citizens bear no resemblance to Chinese people. This is called a stereotype and is defined by Merriam-Webster Dictionary as an ‘often oversimplified or biased mental picture held to characterize the typical individual of a group.’ Everyone uses stereotypes (even I am guilty of this but I make a concerted effort not to) but not all people who use them are prejudiced; some are just ignorant and/or lazy. Comedians often use stereotypes as a form of satire to expose society’s ignorance and prejudices, a technique that was popularized by Sacha Baron Cohen’s 2000 U.K. television series “Da Ali G Show,” which introduced viewers to three eccentric characters: Ali G, Borat Sagdiyev, and Brüno. Each has been the subject of their own films but it was 2006’s mockumentary/comedy “Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan” that earned Cohen critical and box office success, although this was not without controversy as the film’s participants felt that they were tricked and threatened legal action. Often pushing the boundaries of what is socially acceptable, Cohen’s latest film “The Dictator” reunites him with director Larry Charles and is a departure from the comedian’s previously unscripted work. Marred by a poorly-written story, “The Dictator” still manages to boasts some solid laughs but its loose collection of boundary-pushing slapstick comedy never entirely gels with the scripted nature of the film. 

For years, the fictional North African Republic of Wadiya has been ruled by Admiral General Hafez Aladeen (Sacha Baron Cohen), a brutal anti-western, anti-Semitic despot who has his country’s entire populace under his thrall and is actively working on obtaining nuclear capability for ‘peaceful purposes.’ After spending the night with Megan Fox, Aladeen is informed by his uncle and second-in-command Tamir (Ben Kingsley) that the United Nations plan to remove him by military force unless he explains himself to the Security Council about his nuclear program. The dictator is unconcerned but agrees to fly to New York City as demanded. Arriving at the hotel, Tamir introduces Aladeen to his new extra bodyguard Clayton (John C. Reilly), who is actually a hitman hired to kill the dictator. Aladeen is kidnapped in the middle of the night while he is asleep and wakes up to see Clayton about to torture him to death. However, Aladeen points out to him that all his torture tools are outdated, forcing him to simply cut off Aladeen’s beard so that his body cannot be identified when he is killed. Unfortunately, Clayton accidentally lights himself on fire when he tries to burn the beard, allowing Aladeen to quickly escape. He makes his way to the United Nations to give his speech as scheduled but sees Tamir has replaced him with a body double named Efawadh (also Sacha Baron Cohen). Unable to convince the security guards of his true identity, Aladeen is rescued by a protesting activist named Zoey (Anna Faris), who offers him a job at her vegan grocery store. In order to regain his rightful position as Supreme Leader, Aladeen finds himself joining forces with Nadal (Jason Mantzoukas), the former head of Wadiya’s nuclear program, in order to prevent his beloved nation from turning into a democracy. 

One thing you have to admire about Sacha Baron Cohen is his willingness to push boundaries without caring who he’s offending and “The Dictator” proudly continues this tradition by dedicating itself to the memory of Kim Jong-il in the opening title card. Sadly, the film is nothing more than a collection of increasingly ridiculous gags held together by a flimsy story. Granted, there are some genuinely hilarious scenes such as a news segment in the beginning that shows Aladeen shooting all the competitors on the running track in order to win his self-named Olympics or changing the words ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ to ‘Aladeen,’ leading to a funny bit where a man both smiles in relief and cries in sorrow when he is told by his doctor that he is HIV-Aladeen. Later, we see Aladeen forlornly staring at his wall of photographs of every celebrity he has slept with (which includes Oprah Winfrey and even Arnold Schwarzenegger) and playing a Wii game that allows him to reenact various tragedies such as the Munich massacre during the 1972 Summer Olympics. It’s clear that nothing is off limits (or sacred) to Cohen in the name of comedy but as great as some of the jokes were, the context is not always consistent with the comedic payoff and this dilutes the joke’s impact. At one point, Nadal and Aladeen take a helicopter ride to scout out the hotel that the Wadiyan delegation is staying at but despite agreeing to behave as ‘American’ as possible, the two start conversing in their native language while two Midwesterners listen in stunned silence upon hearing the name ‘Osama Bin Laden’ and ‘9/11/2012’ (Aladeen was actually referring to his Porsche model, the 911 2012). It’s a clever way to satirize how ignorant Americans believe that every brown-skinned foreigner is a terrorist but as I pointed out before, the context in which the joke is introduced is inconsistent. This lack of consistency (and logic) plagues the weak narrative as well, leading to head-scratching plot developments where Aladeen falls in love with Zoey despite his extremely racist tendencies or Nadal teaming up with him to get his position back even though the dictator is to blame for his exile in the first place. The film ends with Aladeen giving a speech about the many benefits of a dictatorship and while it’s meant to be an ironic indictment on the present state of democracy, it comes off as half-baked due to the unsubtle way it’s presented. The need to up the ante with the jokes clashes with the need to keep the plot moving and this is ultimately what keeps “The Dictator” from being a nail-biting satire, which is a shame since the film often comes so close to achieving greatness. 

Sacha Baron Cohen is one of the most daring comedians working today who is running dangerously close to being typecast as a one-trick pony. Like his previous characters, Cohen’s Admiral General Aladeen is used as a vehicle to expose society’s hypocrisy in a satirical way but the scripted nature of the film runs counter with his comedic technique. It’s a role he throws himself into with aplomb, mixing elements of real-life dictators such as Kim Jong-il’s cult of personality and Muammar Gaddafi’s Amazonian Guard with playful glee, yet audiences will likely feel they’ve seen it all before. Playing Aladeen’s love interest is a severely underused Anna Faris and the lack of any chemistry between her and Cohen magnifies how pointless their romance is. Academy Award winner Ben Kingsley has a small role as Tamir, who makes no attempt to hide that he’s just picking up another paycheck. 

“The Dictator” was released on May 16, 2012 (a Wednesday) and has received mixed reviews with 58% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics found the film ‘wildly uneven but consistently provocative’ and concluded that it was ‘a decent entry in the political-slapstick comedy genre.’ Managing a respectable $17.4 million and a five-day total of $24.4 million during opening weekend despite the continued box office dominance of “The Avengers,” “The Dictator” has now grossed $52 million domestically, so it at least has a slim chance of matching 2009’s “Brüno.” The audience I saw the film with seemed to enjoy it despite some visible gasps during the more shocking scenes but its low ‘C’ CinemaScore says otherwise and points to how satire often goes over the head of average moviegoers i.e. “The Cabin in the Woods” back in April. Sacha Baron Cohen’s brand of comedy always held a hidden purpose behind the vulgarity as he gets his kicks at poking fun at society’s foibles but “The Dictator” never comes together as a satisfying whole, it’s underdeveloped plot often conflicting with all the jokes.       

Final Rating: 2.5 out of 5

“Why are you guys so anti-dictators? Imagine if America was a dictatorship! You could let 1% of the people have all the nation’s wealth. You could help your rich friends get richer by cutting their taxes and bailing them out when they gamble and lose. You could ignore the needs of the poor for healthcare and education. Your media would appear free but would secretly be controlled by one person and his family. You could wiretap phones; you could torture foreign prisoners; you could have a rigged election; you could lie about why you go to war; you could fill your prison with one particular racial group and no one would complain! You can use the media to scare the people into supporting policies that are against their interests!”

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Chernobyl Diaries Review

Rated R (Violence, Some Bloody Images and Pervasive Language)

Running Time: 1 Hour & 26 Minutes

Cast-
Jesse McCartney-Chris
Jonathan Sadowski-Paul
Devin Kelley-Amanda
Olivia Taylor Dudley-Natalie
Nathan Phillips-Michael
Ingrid Bolsø Berdal-Zoe
Dimitri Diatchenko-Uri

Directed by Bradley Parker

Chernobyl, the perfect place for your next vacation!
On April 26, 1986, a fire broke out at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant located outside the city of Prypiat, Ukraine after a series of power surges and explosions, causing the graphite neutron moderator in reactor number four to ignite due to air exposure. A neutron moderator is a medium that reduces the speed of fast neutrons and turns them into thermal neutrons, which allows for a sustainable nuclear chain reaction involving Uranium-235. The fire from Chernobyl sent a plume of highly radioactive smoke fallout into the atmosphere, covering a large geographical area that included Prypiat and the western Soviet Union with approximately 60% of this fallout landing in Belarus. Prypiat was not immediately evacuated as the citizens went about their business, completely oblivious to what had happened but after a few hours, people began to feel ill. The evacuation formally began on the morning of April 27 where citizens were told to bring only what was necessary as the original plan was to let them return after three days but the relocation eventually became permanent. The personal belongings left behind by Prypiat’s approximately 50,000 inhabitants are still there even after twenty-six years since the disaster and it has been estimated that it will take 20,000 years before the area becomes habitable again. An exclusion zone (dubbed the ‘Zone of Alienation’) was subsequently created and covers approximately 1,004 square miles. The Chernobyl disaster is widely considered to be the worst in history and is only rivaled by the Fukushima Daiichi disaster in 2011 due to the devastating Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. Now, it serves as the inspiration for “Chernobyl Diaries” from director/producer/writer Oren Peli, the creator of the “Paranormal Activity” series which revitalized the found-footage subgenre. Filmed on a production budget of $15,000, the original “Paranormal Activity” received critical and commercial acclaim but the sequels elicited a mixed reception despite continued box office success. While “Chernobyl Diaries” features an interesting premise and some tense scenes, the film ends up being largely derivative and is marred by the sheer idiocy displayed by its characters. 

Three friends: Chris (Jesse McCartney), his girlfriend Natalie (Olivia Taylor Dudley), and their mutual friend Amanda (Devin Kelley) are traveling across Europe, stopping in Kiev, Ukraine to visit Chris’ older brother Paul (Jonathan Sadowski) before heading to Moscow. After a night on the town, Paul suggests that they go on an ‘extreme tour’ of the abandoned town of Prypiat, which was evacuated due to the disaster at the nearby Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986. Chris is vehemently opposed to the idea but he is outvoted three-to-one. They meet with their tour guide Uri (Dimitri Diatchenko) at his office, who reveals that he is a former Spetsnaz operative and has been giving guided tours of Prypiat for the past five years. A newlywed couple, Michael (Nathan Phillips) and Zoe (Ingrid Bolsø Berdal), round out the rest of the tour group and together they set out for Prypiat in Uri’s camo-painted van. After driving for two hours, the group arrives at a security checkpoint on the edge of the exclusion zone but the guards stationed there order them to turn back due to maintenance work being done. Uri decides to take a back road through an unmanned checkpoint into the city. The tour group spends a few hours exploring Prypiat and take pictures while Uri explains some of the local history before the city was abandoned in the wake of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. As the group prepares to leave, Uri is unable to start the van and discovers that the wires have been chewed through. He radios for help but no one answers and as night falls, it becomes apparent that Prypiat may not be abandoned after all. 

The initial previews for “Chernobyl Diaries” left me intrigued and I was interested in what Oren Peli (who only serves as writer/producer) and first-time director Bradley Parker would bring to the table. The premise actually has some basis in reality as the exclusion zone is relatively safe to visit and guided tours can be provided as long as you have the necessary paperwork. Instead of shooting the film ‘found-footage’ style like in the “Paranormal Activity” films, Peli and Parker opted for a third-person, documentary approach and utilized ‘shaky cam’ to keep the action grounded and create suspense. With its post-apocalyptic backdrop, the ghost town of Prypiat is suitably atmospheric and Parker takes full advantage of this as the tour group wanders through the abandoned streets and explores the dilapidated buildings. There’s a quiet eeriness to the city and it’s hard to believe that the film was actually shot in Eastern Europe (mainly in Belgrade, Serbia and Budapest, Hungary) thanks to the excellent production design from Aleksandar Denic and Matthew Sullivan. These two went to great lengths to recreate Prypiat using a combination of practical sets and CG to fill in the blanks. 

Unfortunately, the rest of the film never lives up to its premise and setting, devolving into a blatant rip-off of “The Hills Have Eyes,” both the 1977 original and the 2006 remake! The latter half is spent with the film’s one-dimensional characters running around in the dark and behaving in an idiotic manner such as screaming someone’s name at the top of their lungs while being chased by creatures in the dark or turning your attention away from your friends just to satisfy your own damn curiosity. In fact, the group’s behavior defies all logical reasoning so it’s ironic when one of the leads remarks at one point that ‘we need to be smart about this.’ Maybe you should try heeding your own advice? Despite not being a found-footage project (there’s only one scene that takes place from the point-of-view of a video camera), the film borrows several elements from the subgenre such as the heavy use of ‘shaky cam’ to supposedly ratchet up the tension but all it does is create a blurred mess of struggling bodies. Many of the scares are ‘Boo!’ moments but they are so obviously telegraphed (What’s lurking behind the sheet?!) that it ultimately dilutes their impact. As for the creatures themselves, the revelation of what they are is uninspired and a serious letdown but it’s not like you ever get a good look at them thanks to the camera having a schizophrenic seizure. “Chernobyl Diaries” could’ve been a scary good time given its concept but Parker’s execution leaves much to be desired, making the setting a total waste given how dull the final result is. 

Much of the cast won’t be recognizable to casual moviegoers but Jesse McCartney is a singer/songwriter who starred in ABC’s now-cancelled daytime soap opera “All My Children” during the late 1990’s while Devin Kelly appeared on “The Chicago Code” in 2011, a crime drama on Fox that was also cancelled. Jonathan Sadowski was in the short-lived 2010 CBS comedy “S#*! My Dad Says” with William Shatner and Australian actor Nathan Philips made his American debut in 2006’s “Snakes on a Plane” alongside Samuel L. Jackson. Individually, the performances are competent enough but despite the improvised dialogue, the chemistry among the group often comes off as stilted and forced on-screen. None of their characters are particularly interesting to begin with nor are they sympathetic given the lack of common sense they frequently display. 

Released on May 25, 2012, “Chernobyl Diaries” has received overwhelmingly negative reviews with 21% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics found the film ‘mostly short on suspense and originality’ despite an ‘interesting premise and spooky atmospherics.’ There was a minor controversy leading up to its release where charity organization Friends of Chernobyl Centers, U.S. deemed the plot to be insensitive to those who were affected by the disaster but Peli stated that this not the case and that another charity group, Chabad's Children of Chernobyl, had already written him a letter expressing their ‘admiration’ and ‘kudos’ for his film. Whatever the case may be, it provided a nice boost in publicity. This is also not the first time where the disaster was used as a basis for an original story and the most famous example is the PC video game S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Shadow of Chernobyl from Ukrainian developers GSC Game World. Opening against “Men in Black III” during Memorial Day weekend, the film ended up with a four-day debut of $9.3 million and has earned $15 million domestically, which is a far cry from Peli’s “Paranormal Activity” films. However, the production budget was reportedly $1 million so it has already turned a small profit for Warner Brothers even with such low numbers. The real-life event that “Chernobyl Diaries” is based on will likely fascinate viewers but the film itself squanders all of its potential with well-worn horror clichés, offering little in the way of suspense or payoff.

Final Rating: 2 out of 5

“Uri, who is really excited to take us there, is an extreme tour guide. He's going to show us this city that was abandoned overnight…literally! They had no time to take anything. Factories, schools, stores, homes apartments—everything's still there. Imagine the photo shoot you could have there, Amanda.”

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Dark Shadows Review

Rated PG-13 (Comic Horror Violence, Sexual Content, Some Drug Use, Language and Smoking)

Running Time: 1 Hour & 53 Minutes

Cast-
Johnny Depp-Barnabas Collins
Eva Green-Angelique Bouchard
Michelle Pfeiffer-Elizabeth Collins Stoddard
Helena Bonham Carter-Dr. Julia Hoffman
Chloë Grace Moretz-Carolyn Stoddard
Jonny Lee Miller-Roger Collins
Gulliver McGrath-David Collins
Bella Heathcote-Victoria Winters/Josette du Pres
Jackie Earle Haley-Willie Loomis
Christopher Lee-Clarney
Ray Shirley-Mrs. Johnson
Ivan Kaye-Joshua Collins
Susanna Cappellaro-Naomi Collins
Alice Cooper-As Himself

Directed by Tim Burton

Barnabas Collins (Johnny Depp) awakens after a two-century slumber to find himself in a strange new world in Tim Burton's "Dark Shadows."
Back in 1990, 20th Century Fox released Tim Burton’s “Edward Scissorhands,” a romance/fantasy film about an artificial man with large scissors instead of hands who is taken in by a kind suburban family and subsequently falls in love with their teenage daughter. Playing the titular character was Johnny Depp, who at the time was attempting to distance himself from his teen idol status due to his role as undercover police officer Tom Hanson on the television series “21 Jump Street,” which was recently adapted into an action comedy film starring Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill, with Depp even making a surprise cameo. The actor reportedly ‘wept like a baby’ when he finished reading the script for “Edward Scissorhands” and thus began the first of many collaborations between Depp and director Tim Burton. From 1999’s “Sleepy Hollow” to 2010’s “Alice in Wonderland,” Depp and Burton have worked together in seven films in the past twenty-two years. This summer saw the release of “Dark Shadows,” their eighth feature based upon the gothic soap opera of the same name that aired from 1966 to 1971 on ABC, with an amazing grand total of 1225 episodes. Created by Dan Curtis, the show became wildly popular when Jonathan Frid’s vampire Barnabas Collins was introduced a year into its run and was lauded for its dramatic story-telling, melodramatic performances, and atmospheric interiors. Featuring supernatural and science fiction elements such as werewolves, parallel universes, and time travel, the show was noted for its quirks resulting from filming in a live-to-tape format, meaning scenes were shot in one take. The cast would often struggle with their lines and unintentionally bump into objects on the set while a stagehand can be seen working in the background. Obsessed with the show as a child, Depp called it his ‘childhood dream’ to portray Barnabas Collins and managed to persuade Burton to direct, who happened to be a fan of the show as well.  Depp and Burton’s love for the show is clearly evident in every scene but while “Dark Shadows” excels with its macabre visuals and gorgeous production/costume design, the film suffers from an inconsistent tone, a meandering story, and underdeveloped characters. 

Wishing to expand their fishing business, the wealthy Joshua Collins (Ivan Kaye) sets sail from Liverpool, England toward North America in 1760 with his wife Naomi (Susanna Cappellaro) and young son Barnabas. They settle in what is now Maine and form a small fishing town called Collinsport, which quickly prospers under the guiding hand of the Collins family. An elaborate mansion dubbed Collinwood Manor is soon built to establish permanent roots in their new home. Barnabas (Johnny Depp) grows up to be a playboy in the town and enjoys a dalliance with a servant girl named Angelique Bouchard (Eva Green) but ends up rejecting her in favor of Josette du Pres (Bella Heathcote). Revealing herself to be a witch, Angelique kills Barnabas’ parents by crushing them with a statue that plummets from the roof and forces Josette to jump off a cliff called Widow’s Peak using a powerful spell. Barnabas fails to save her in time and is cursed to be a vampire by Angelique, who riles up the townspeople and buries him alive in a chained coffin in the woods. Fast forward 212 years later in 1972, a young woman named Victoria Winters (also Bella Heathcote) arrives at Collinwood Manor to accept the position of governess to a young boy, David Collins (Gulliver McGrath). The current matriarch of the Collins family is Elizabeth Collins Stoddard (Michelle Pfeiffer), who has a sullen fifteen-year-old daughter named Carolyn (Chloë Grace Moretz). Her brother Roger (Jonny Lee Miller) is also the indifferent father to David. Living with them is Dr. Julia Hoffman (Helena Bonham Carter), the family psychiatrist hired to help David move on from his mother’s death. Meanwhile, a group of construction workers discover Barnabas’ coffin and accidentally free him. After quenching his thirst for blood by feeding on the workers, Barnabas makes his way toward Collinwood Manor. He is disappointed to see his former home in ruins and introduces himself to Elizabeth, convincing her that he really is who he says he is. Learning that the family has fallen on hard times, Barnabas takes it upon himself to restore their business and good name but must contend with Angelique, who has now become a prominent citizen of Collinsport thanks to her rival fishing business, Angel Bay Fishery. 

Before I begin, let me just say that I have not seen the original “Dark Shadows” television series since it was before my time so I cannot comment how faithful Tim Burton’s film adaptation is compared to the show. For those who are interested in the series, it is available for streaming on Netflix and will be released in a deluxe edition DVD box set (shaped like a coffin) on July 10, although it will cost a pretty penny even at the discounted $431.99 price on Amazon. Many of Tim Burton’s films are driven by macabre visuals and “Dark Shadows” is no different, featuring a dreary atmosphere courtesy of cinematographer Bruno Delbonnel. The production design from Rick Heinrichs is impeccable, especially Collinwood Manor with its low-lit rooms and ornate architecture. Finally, Colleen Atwood’s (who also worked on “Snow White and the Huntsman”) costumes capture the ridiculous fashions of the 1970’s while also maintaining an oddball quality to them. Of course, audiences have come to expect interesting and kooky visuals from Tim Burton and “Dark Shadows” excels at this but when it comes to the story, it’s something of a mess. Written by John August and Seth Grahame-Smith, the film never finds a consistent tone and often flip-flops from gloomy melodrama to horror comedy. The premise of a normal family’s lives being turned upside down when they let a stranger live with them is a rehash of previous Burton films, including the aforementioned “Edward Scissorhands” and 1988’s “Beetlejuice,” making this one a largely derivative affair. 

Once Barnabas Collins shows up, Burton plays up his ‘fish-out-of-water’ experience for laughs while the film spins its wheels until the final twenty minutes when it suddenly remembers that it has a story to tell. Granted, some of the scenes are funny such as Barnabas leering at a lava lamp mistaking it for blood or yelling ‘What sorcery is this? Reveal yourself, tiny songstress!’ when he first encounters a television. Upon waking from his two-century slumber, he mistakes a giant ‘M’ for the symbol of Mephistopheles and demands the devil to show himself (‘Mock me not with your strange luminance!’) when he encounters a car’s headlights in the distance. Later, he has this ridiculous sex scene with Eva Green’s Angelique where the two tumble around the room and break all the furniture while Barry White’s You're the First, the Last, My Everything plays in the background. Quite a lot of music from the 1970’s is used which adds to the eccentric tone of the film. The comedy won’t leave you rolling on the floor laughing but it makes the film’s middle section more bearable as nothing really happens. With the exception of Barnabas and Angelique, the supporting characters are never developed beyond their basic roles and some of the revelations about the Collins family feel unearned at the end. Tim Burton is a talented director but “Dark Shadows” is one of his weaker films and proves that excellent visuals cannot make up for the lack of a compelling story. 

Like the “Pirates of the Caribbean” series, Johnny Depp’s presence help elevate “Dark Shadows,” who throws himself into the role of Barnabas Collins and delivers a fun, earnest performance while wearing eighteen century clothes and chalk-white makeup. His dialogue delivery is intentionally stiff to reflect the old-fashioned quality of the character. In fact, the entire film hinges on Depp as everyone’s actions are usually a reaction to Barnabas’. Similarly, Eva Green is excellent as Angelique Bouchard with her controlling yet seductive demeanor. Like Depp, she is clearly having fun with the role and successfully juggles (no pun intended!) the comedy/horror aspect that Burton desperately strives for. The rest of the cast is largely wasted but Michelle Pfeiffer, Chloë Grace Moretz, and Helena Bonham Carter do their best with what they’re given. Four of the cast members from the original television series: Jonathan Frid, Lara Parker, David Selby and Kathryn Leigh Scott also make cameo appearances during a ball held in the Collinwood Manor. 

Released on May 11, 2012, “Dark Shadows” received mixed reviews from critics with 40% on Rotten Tomatoes. They agreed that ‘the visuals are top notch but Tim Burton never finds a consistent rhythm, mixing campy jokes and gothic spookiness with less success than other Johnny Depp collaborations.’ Due to the massive shadow cast by “The Avengers,” the film never really stood a chance, opening with $29.7 million but it won’t be a total loss for Warner Brothers as it has currently grossed $191 million worldwide. Part of the problem can be attributed to the obscurity of the television series and the fact the Barnabas Collins does not sparkle like million dollar diamonds. I saw the film three weeks after release and it was rather sad to see such a pitiful audience. “Dark Shadows” was clearly made with affection by Tim Burton and Johnny Depp but the film’s focus on the visuals and atmosphere led to the story becoming little more than an afterthought. Although Burton fans will be more forgiving, even they will come away disappointed and wonder if the director is losing his touch.

Final Rating: 3 out of 5

“I have already prepared my counter-proposal. It reads thusly: You may strategically place your wonderful lips upon my posterior and kiss it repeatedly!”

Friday, June 1, 2012

The Flowers of War (金陵十三钗) Review

Rated R (Strong Violence including a Sexual Assault, Disturbing Images, and Brief Strong Language)

Running Time: 2 Hours & 26 Minutes

Cast-
Christian Bale-John Miller
Ni Ni-Yu Mo
Zhang Xinyi-Shu-Juan Meng
Huang Tian-Yuan-George Chen
Tong Dawei-Major Li
Atsuro Watabe-Colonel Hasegawa
Cao Kefan-Mr. Meng
Han Xiting-Yi
Zhang Doudou-Ling
Yuan Yangchunzi-Mosquito
Sun Jia-Hua
Li Yuemin-Dou
Bai Xue-Lan
Takashi Yamanaka-Lieutenant Asakura
Shigeo Kobayashi-Lieutenant Kato
Paul Schneider-Terry

Directed by Zhang Yimou

John Miller (Christian Bale) and George Chen (Huang Tian-Yuan) confront the devastation the Japanese wrought in 1937 Nanking in Zhang Yimou's "The Flowers of War."
Note: In English and Nanking Mandarin with English subtitles.

Back when I was a sophomore in high school, my history teacher took our class to the Museum of Jewish Heritage—A Living Memorial to the Holocaust in lower Manhattan, New York as we were studying World War II at the time. Called by Adolf Hitler as his ‘Final Solution,’ the Holocaust was the systematic genocide of approximately six million European Jews and other ‘undesirables’ in the name of Nazi ideology. A number of films such as Steven Spielberg’s “Schindler's List” and Roman Polanski’s “The Pianist” have dealt with the Holocaust but one equally horrific event that continues to be overlooked is the Nanking Massacre or ‘Rape of Nanking’ where Japanese soldiers engaged in mass murder and rape over a six-week period following their capture of the city on December 13, 1937 during the Second Sino-Japanese War. Being Chinese, the barbaric actions that the Japanese committed has been brought up quite a few times among my family, with my mother remarking that it was my ‘obligation’ to hate the Japanese for what they did. I am not one to condemn an entire people but such feelings are the reason why China and Japan continue to share a tenuous relationship seventy-five years later. I always felt that the Nanking Massacre was marginalized compared to the attention that the Holocaust has received around the world and while it has been the subject of a few films, none have really connected with a Western audience with the exception of 2009’s “City of Life and Death” directed by Lu Chuan. Now we have “The Flowers of War” from acclaimed Chinese director Zhang Yimou, a historical drama/war film based upon the 2011 novel 13 Flowers of Nanking by Geling Yan. With a production budget of $94 million, this is the most expensive film made in China and is the first to be headlined by a major Hollywood actor. “The Flowers of War” has its heart in the right place but the film ultimately makes for an emotionally hollow experience as Zhang Yimou never nails down the proper tone, resorting to predictable clichés and overblown melodrama in his attempts to tell a sweeping tale of redemption and sacrifice. 

Taking place a few days after Nanking has fallen to the invading Japanese on December 13, 1937, a number of Catholic schoolgirls led by Shu-Juan Meng (Zhang Xinyi) flee for their lives from a band of marauding soldiers. Meanwhile, an American mortician named John Miller (Christian Bale) makes his way through the devastated streets of the city to bury Father Ingleman, the head priest at Winchester Cathedral. John finds himself hiding with Shu to escape the notice of a suspicious Japanese soldier and learns that she happens to be a student at the same church he is going to. Arriving at Winchester, John is told by George Chen (Huang Tian-Yuan), an orphan adopted by Ingleman, that there is no body to bury due to it being blasted away by a bomb. John insists that he still has to be paid and searches the church for money despite the protestations of George. A short time later, a group of flamboyant prostitutes led by Yu Mo (Ni Ni) from the local red-light distract come to the church looking for shelter, believing that the presence of a Westerner like John will protect them from the Japanese. Seeing so many attractive women and taking advantage of Ingleman’s comfortable lodgings, John decides to spend the night at the church. He drunkenly tries to sleep with Yu Mo but when Japanese soldiers break into the church looking for girls to rape, John decides to pose as the head priest in order to save them. John is faced with a difficult decision when Shu and the rest of the schoolgirls are ordered by Colonel Hasegawa (Atsuro Watabe) to attend a party with dark intentions. 

From 1991’s “Raise the Red Lantern” to 2002’s “Hero,” Zhang Yimou has earned numerous accolades for his work and deservedly so but “The Flowers of War” represents a rare misstep as his film is marred by plot contrivances, predictable clichés, and a tone that is all over the place in an attempt to appeal to both American and Chinese audiences. The film does not shy away from the brutality of what happened in Nanking with soldiers being mercilessly gun downed on both sides and women being gang-raped but these grim realities of war never entirely gel with the cavalier attitudes that some of the characters display. Despite seeing the destruction wrought by the Japanese, John is all smiles during the first forty or so minutes of the film as he flirts with the prostitutes, who spend their time giggling over trivial matters while a war rages on outside. John eventually grows to sympathize with the schoolgirls’ plight but the prostitutes never treat their plight seriously, robbing much of the urgency and anguish we’re supposed to feel during the last half-hour. The transformation of John from drunkard to savior is also rushed and never comes about organically.  It feels like two totally different characters played by the same actor as the plot barrels along in a forced manner. In one scene, Yu Mo discovers two of the prostitutes have snuck out of the church for the most ridiculous reasons and while Zhang Yimou wants to emphasize the helplessness of women at the hands of the Japanese, the set-up throws logic out the window. Worst yet is how predictable the film is. Once John says he’s ‘not good with kids’ and locks eyes with Yu Mo, it’s immediately clear that the two will fall in love and that he’ll give up his booze-drinking ways to save the schoolgirls. The film aspires for earnest pathos and resorts to weepy melodrama to provoke the reaction it wants from the audience but too often the hamstrung dialogue prevents that from happening. 

The script was written by Liu Heng and approximately half the film is spoken in English with the rest in Nanking Mandarin. Dialogue exchanges in English often come off as awkward as it seems to have been translated from Chinese, resulting in lines that are grammatically correct but incredibly stilted due to the phonetic delivery. What “The Flowers of War” does well is capture the heightened sense of fear and desperation that George and the schoolgirls feel, making you wish the film focused on them rather than on the schmaltzy romance. A scene where a group of Japanese soldiers chase the girls through the church in an attempt to rape them is harrowing to watch and while some may complain that the Japanese are depicted as little more than brutes, this is what happened. Colonel Hasegawa is presented as a homesick Japanese soldier forced to carry out his duty but his inclusion lacks the nuance compared to Lu Chuan’s “City of Life and Death.” Near the end of the film, George pleads with John to let him sacrifice himself and it is at this point that I felt what Zhang Yimou wanted me to feel but it’s ultimately too little too late. Zhang Yimou’s style is often punctuated by his rich use of color and it’s no different here, although the constant use of slow motion feels excessive such as when a pipa’s strings snap apart or bullets whizzing through the church’s garishly colored window. The production design is excellent and the battle scenes are well-choreographed as Chinese soldiers futilely attempt to slow the advance of the Japanese. The story is a mess but no will deny that “The Flowers of War” produces some striking images. 

The acting is a mixed bag but some of the blame lies with how the English dialogue was written. Christian Bale is one of my favorite actors but this is one of his weakest performances. He tries to inject a sense of humor and earnestness in John but his character is little more than an excuse to pander to Americans too lazy to read subtitles. Ni Ni exudes eroticism as she sashays across the church despite the formal way she delivers her dialogue. However, she and Bale never has the spark that the film repeatedly strives for. Finally, there’s Huang Tian-Yuan’s George and Zhang Xinyi’s Shu, who are excellent in capturing the all-pervasive fear and hopelessness that their lives could end at any moment in time. 

“The Flowers of War” was released on December 16, 2011 in China and in New York City five days later for one week to qualify for the 84th Academy Awards. It had an expanded limited release on January 20, 2012 but inspired little interest as American audiences are largely indifferent to foreign language films, ultimately grossing a disappointing $311,434. However, the film has already become a box office hit in China, grossing close to $100 million. The film failed to impress critics with 41% Rotten Tomatoes as many pointed out that Yimou’s approach was too heavy-handed due to the exaggerated sentimentalism. While it was nominated for Best Foreign Language Film at the 69th Golden Globe Awards, it lost to Iran’s “A Separation” and wasn’t even able to make the final shortlist for the 84th Academy Awards. The Nanking Massacre is an important event in Chinese history that should and needs to be explored more in film but “The Flowers of War” never nails down the proper tone with its confused mix of brutality and mawkish melodrama. This is a noble effort from Zhang Yimou that ultimately fails to achieve what it set out to do.

Final Rating: 2.5 out of 5

“This is a house of the Lord! These are children! You are breaking the laws of Man and of God! No soldiers here! You have no business being here! I am the priest! And I command you, in the name of the Father to leave now! You are honorable men, behave honorably!”