Monday, March 4, 2013

The Last Exorcism Part II Review

Rated PG-13 (Horror Violence, Terror and Brief Language)

Running Time: 1 Hour & 28 Minutes

Cast-
Ashley Bell-Nell Sweetzer
Julia Garner-Gwen
Spencer Treat Clark-Chris
Muse Watson-Frank Merle
Tarra Riggs-Cecile
David Jensen-Calder
E. Roger Mitchell-Jeffrey
Erica Michelle-Daphne
Sharice Angelle Williams-Mo
Louis Herthum-Louis Sweetzer

Directed by Ed Gass-Donnelly


Ashley Bell reprises her role as Nell Sweetzer in "The Last Exorcism Part II."
Note: At AMC Loews 34th Street 14.

Have you ever noticed how every film dealing with demonic possession has always centered on a female being the possessed? Off the top of my head, the only one to involve a male is 2011's "The Rite" starring Anthony Hopkins. Of course, you can't talk about such films without at least mentioning "The Exorcist" and despite being released almost forty years ago, William Friedkin's horror classic continues to cast a large shadow over the exorcism subgenre. No other film has yet come close to matching it but that hasn't stopped Hollywood from trying. Three years ago, Lionsgate released "The Last Exorcism" and while it was obviously an attempt to cash-in on the success of "Paranormal Activity," the film managed to receive surprisingly positive reviews (73% on Rotten Tomatoes). Shot as a mockumentary by German director Daniel Stamm, the film's story focused on a disillusioned reverend who wants to expose exorcism as a fraud. With a small film crew in tow, the reverend drives out to a remote farm in Louisiana to perform his last 'exorcism' on a young girl but instead finds out that she is truly possessed. Although bereft of any actual scares, what put "The Last Exorcism" above the usual cookie-cutter fare was its focus on the characters, particularly Patrick Fabian's Cotton Marcus. His charismatic performance allowed you to remain invested even when the ending completely goes off the rails. Since the film made almost forty times its $1.8 million production budget ($67.7 million worldwide), a sequel was green-lit even though nobody asked for one. Unfortunately, "The Last Exorcism Part II" jettisons everything that made the original a success. Ashley Bell remains the sole bright spot in a film that bores more than it thrills…and don't even get me started on what's wrong with the title! 

Picking up immediately after the events of the first film, a couple wakes up to find a feral Nell Sweetzer (Ashley Bell) inhabiting their kitchen. Catatonic and with barely any memory of what happened in Ivanwood, she is soon placed into the care of Frank Merle (Muse Watson), who runs a halfway house for troubled teenage girls in New Orleans. Convinced that her ordeal was nothing more than a delusion brought about by cult abuse, Nell resolves to put her past behind her and slowly begins to build a new life for herself. She makes significant progress over the next several months, quickly acclimating to the outside world that was previously unknown to her. There's even a potential boyfriend, Chris (Spencer Treat Clark), whom she meets at her new job as a hotel housekeeper. However, Nell's newfound bliss is short-lived as she starts having nightmares and waking hallucinations of her dead father, Louis (Louis Herthum). The demon Abalam has returned to haunt her and this time, it won't let her go that easily. 

The original "Last Exorcism" didn't exactly reinvent the wheel when it came to found-footage films but its story was told from a unique point-of-view and had characters that were grounded in reality. For some inexplicable reason, the sequel abandons this in favor of a more conventional approach. That wouldn't be so bad if it actually had a story to tell. "The Last Exorcism Part II" is very much a tacked-on follow-up as the film goes nowhere for much of the first hour, recycling the same jump-scares and lame fake-outs that plague the horror genre today, especially the PG-13 ones. It's just so bland to the point where I almost dozed off. Even worse is that the characters from the original are swept under the rug as if they've never existed. Sure, their footage shows up on YouTube but why does it contain all the dramatic bits? As this is an 'exorcism' film, one is awkwardly shoehorned in where a voodoo priestess named Cecile (Tarra Riggs) just seemingly pops out of nowhere and starts speaking of prophecies and the 'end of days.' Not surprisingly, the film ends on a cliffhanger but it does leave Nell at an interesting place. It'll likely invite mixed reactions yet I feel it was an improvement compared to how the first one ended. What's really disappointing is that "Part II" had the potential to be a decent horror film. Ed Gass-Donnelly's direction is competent, the drama isn't half-bad and the script from newcomer Damien Chazelle has a few good ideas. Unfortunately, all this is undone by the film's failure to follow its own logic. The demon Abalam is revealed to be 'in love' with Nell but can only be free if she only gives herself to him by choice. Considering that Abalam is pleasuring her while she's asleep, consent seems to be the least of his worries.  It's supposed to represent Nell's sexual awakening but none of it makes any sense the more you try to connect the dots. This is just further proof that "The Last Exorcism Part II" has no reason existing in the first place and was only made to cash-in on the first film. 

The one thing I can praise without reservation is Ashley Bell's performance. Bringing a sense of vulnerability and innocent naiveté to her character, Bell truly deserves a much better film to showcase her talents. Also returning from the first film is Louis Herthum as her father but his inclusion is largely perfunctory. The rest of the supporting cast includes Julia Garner (from " Martha Marcy May Marlene"), Spencer Treat Clark and Muse Watson. They're all fine in their roles yet the story gives them little to do. Faring even worse are the exorcists as Tarra Riggs, David Jensen, and E. Roger Mitchell are squandered in the worst way possible. 

Released on March 1, 2013, "The Last Exorcism Part II" was not screened for critics in advance, so its 13% rating on Rotten Tomatoes should come as no surprise. It grossed only $8 million over opening weekend, a fraction of the original but the film should still turn a small profit for CBS Films since this is a micro-budget production (around $5 million). During an afternoon showing, the theater sat virtually empty. Competent direction aside, "The Last Exorcism Part II" is ultimately a lumbering bore even at 88 minutes and not only does the film waste Ashley Bell's talents but it's also an unnecessary sequel that's neither needed not wanted. Let's hope that this is truly the "Last Exorcism" because I have zero interest in seeing a third one, no matter how funny the titles may be.

Final Rating: 2 out of 5

"He's still out there…the demon…Abalam."