Rated
PG-13 (A Mature Thematic Image and Some Sci-Fi Action/Violence)
Running
Time: 1 Hour & 34 Minutes
Cast-
Brenton
Thwaites-Jonas
Jeff
Bridges-The Giver
Odeya
Rush-Fiona
Cameron
Monaghan-Asher
Katie
Holmes-Jonas' Mother
Alexander
Skarsgård-Jonas' Father
Meryl
Streep-Chief Elder
Taylor
Swift-Rosemary
Emma
Tremblay-Lilly
Alexander
Jillings/James Jillings-Gabriel (Twelve Months)
Saige
Fernandes-Gabriel (Six Months)
Jordan
Nicholas Smal-Gabriel (Three Months)
Renate
Stuurman-Dinah
Kira
Wilkinson-Chief Elder's Assistant
Directed
by Phillip Noyce
Note: Screened on Monday, August 11, 2014 at the Ziegfeld Theater (Red Carpet Premiere).
Lois Lowry's seminal novel The Giver finally arrives on the big screen. |
Young
adult novels—especially ones centered on strong-willed teenagers struggling
against a bleak, oppressive dystopia—are currently all the rage in Hollywood
alongside comic book superheroes. Given that we now live in an age where a
book's film rights are often optioned out to a movie studio before said book even
hits store shelves, it's rather shocking to see Lois Lowry's The Giver, one of the most popular and
most cherished works in YA fiction, take over twenty years to arrive on the big
screen. Published back in 1993, Lowry was inspired to write the novel when her
elderly father began exhibiting signs of memory loss. She noticed that 'he was
content, as he had forgotten every sad and scary event that he experienced,
including…the death of his first child—[Lowry's] sister—at a young age.' This
led her to 'think about the importance of memory and how one can manipulate
it.' Over the course of two decades, Lowry's 1994 Newberry Medal-winning novel
has sold nearly twelve million copies worldwide and has become a classroom
staple in America. Not only did students enjoy
reading the book when it was assigned, those that didn't have to read it willingly
sought it out for themselves.
Actor
Jeff Bridges has wanted to make a film adaptation of The Giver for eighteen years. He first came across the book while
looking for material in which he could direct his father, Lloyd Bridges. Upon
seeing the grizzled old man on the front cover, he thought to himself, 'Oh
yeah, my dad can play that guy!' Bridges even went so far as to make a homemade
movie with his father in the title role and his nephew Dylan—son of his older
brother, Emmy Award-winning actor Beau Bridges—as main character Jonas (I hope
this is included as an extra on the Blu-Ray release). Since the novel was so
successful, Bridges believed that the film adaptation would be an easy sell in
Hollywood. Unfortunately, that didn't turn out to be the case. First, films
based on young adult novels weren't exactly in vogue at the time. Second,
Lowry's book was incredibly controversial and was frequently banned in schools
due to its mature themes. Third, the novel was very introspective, which made
it difficult to translate on-screen. Difficult doesn't mean impossible and
while it may have taken a lot longer than Bridges expected, "The
Giver" has finally been released into theaters, courtesy of The Weinstein
Company. However, the film would still be stuck in development hell if it
weren't for the critical and commercial success of Lionsgate's "The Hunger
Games" series, and therein lies the problem. Phillip Noyce's adaptation of
Lowry's seminal novel is well-shot, well-written, and well-acted yet it can't
help but feel derivative when its themes and setting have already been explored
in the countless other books and films that have followed in its wake.
There's much more of an overt romance between Jonas and Fiona compared to the novel. |
Following
an undefined catastrophe in the future, society has rebuilt itself and
eliminated all pain, fear, war, and hatred but this came at great personal cost
as people—separated into 'communities' encased by distinct locational
boundaries—must now follow a strict set of rules governing language, privacy,
and honesty. A regimented daily injection prevents people from feeling any emotion—and,
by extension, removes choice—and seeing any color. It is a society that lives
in 'sameness' as everyone has identical homes, identical clothes, and an
identical family structure. In one such community lives sixteen-year-old Jonas
(Brenton Thwaites), who is about to participate in an annual ceremony in which
he and his friends Fiona (Odeya Rush) and Asher (Cameron Monaghan) will be
assigned a job by the Chief Elder (Meryl Streep) while workers who are past
their prime retire to a place known as 'Elsewhere.' However, Jonas' job is no
ordinary assignment as he has been chosen to become the 'Receiver of Memories.'
Meeting the 'Giver' (Jeff Bridges) on the very edge of town, the young man is
slowly given the collective memories of the past—both good and bad—through
physical transference. Jonas soon begins to see the world in vivid color and
experiences emotion, like love, for the first time. As he spends more time with
the Giver, Jonas comes to realize that there is something seriously wrong with
the community he lives in, putting him at odds with his parents (Katie Holmes
and Alexander Skarsgård) and the Chief Elder.
Given
how important color becomes in the dystopian world of "The Giver,"
it's only appropriate that the most immediately striking aspect of the film is
the way it looks. Noyce and his team certainly put their tight budget (an
estimated $25 million) to good use because the production design and art
direction is simply fantastic. With its immaculately landscaped modular 'dwellings,'
cleanly paved out-of-the-way roads, and geometric greenery, production designer
Ed Verreaux has done a fine job in creating a society that's plausibly
futuristic yet also emotionally suppressed. This sleek, antiseptic world is
further enhanced by Ross Emery's black-and-white cinematography, which mirrors the
way Jonas and the other residents in the community view everything around them.
Emery takes a page out of Gary Ross' 1998 dramedy "Pleasantville" by
showing occasional flourishes of color—Fiona's brunette hair, a red apple, a
fleeting rainbow—but the film doesn't give way to color until the thirty-minute
mark. When Jonas begins receiving the collective memories of the past, Noyce
lets loose with vivid, hyper-realized montages that include well-known
historical events like the Tiananmen Square protests and the fall of the Berlin
Wall, as well as everyday acts of daring-do such as skydivers plummeting at
dizzying heights or river rafters navigating raging rapids. Color represents
life and vitality, and taken on purely visual terms, "The Giver" is a
success.
I wish I can say the same for the film's story. Personally, I've never read Lowry's novel (it was never assigned to me in school) but I did familiarize myself with its general plotline before seeing Noyce's adaptation. Let me make this clear, there's nothing inherently wrong with the story itself. It's well-written as I mentioned in the beginning, and writers Michael Mitnick and Robert B. Weide have remained faithful to the source material's themes regarding the importance of memory and personal choice. Memory is what makes us who we are and without the collective experiences of our remembrances, our lives have no meaning and we might as well be mindless automatons. A person cannot truly appreciate joy without having felt pain as one cannot exist without the other. The film isn't exactly subtle when getting these ideas across, especially when it starts hammering home the power of capital-L Love, but the problem here is that they feel outdated and worse, derivative. This comes down to the unfortunate fact that Noyce's adaptation has arrived on screen after "The Hunger Games" and "Divergent" already mined such territory, albeit in slightly different ways. It's ironic because The Giver was published long before Suzanne Collins and Veronica Roth's books came out. Since audiences now expect a nice dose of action with these YA adaptations, this leads to the writers trying to 'amp up' a novel that's introspective at its core. Instead of Jonas simply taking baby Gabriel and setting off for Elsewhere, the film depicts it as a chase between the young man and the community's enforcers. It's obvious that Noyce and his writers tried their best in bringing Lowry's novel to the big screen. Unfortunately, their efforts are hurt by bad timing.
I wish I can say the same for the film's story. Personally, I've never read Lowry's novel (it was never assigned to me in school) but I did familiarize myself with its general plotline before seeing Noyce's adaptation. Let me make this clear, there's nothing inherently wrong with the story itself. It's well-written as I mentioned in the beginning, and writers Michael Mitnick and Robert B. Weide have remained faithful to the source material's themes regarding the importance of memory and personal choice. Memory is what makes us who we are and without the collective experiences of our remembrances, our lives have no meaning and we might as well be mindless automatons. A person cannot truly appreciate joy without having felt pain as one cannot exist without the other. The film isn't exactly subtle when getting these ideas across, especially when it starts hammering home the power of capital-L Love, but the problem here is that they feel outdated and worse, derivative. This comes down to the unfortunate fact that Noyce's adaptation has arrived on screen after "The Hunger Games" and "Divergent" already mined such territory, albeit in slightly different ways. It's ironic because The Giver was published long before Suzanne Collins and Veronica Roth's books came out. Since audiences now expect a nice dose of action with these YA adaptations, this leads to the writers trying to 'amp up' a novel that's introspective at its core. Instead of Jonas simply taking baby Gabriel and setting off for Elsewhere, the film depicts it as a chase between the young man and the community's enforcers. It's obvious that Noyce and his writers tried their best in bringing Lowry's novel to the big screen. Unfortunately, their efforts are hurt by bad timing.
The presence of Jeff Bridges and Meryl Streep lend "The Giver" a prestige quality. |
Released
on August 15, 2014, "The Giver" has received mixed-to-negative
reviews with 31% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics noted that 'Phillip Noyce directs…with
visual grace, but the movie doesn't dig deep enough into the classic source
material's thought-provoking ideas.' Personally, I feel the film is being
unfairly maligned because it's following in the wake of "The Hunger
Games" and "Divergent." It's certainly a bit more contemplative
and not as exciting to watch compared to the aforementioned big-screen adaptations
but that's what makes "The Giver so refreshing—its simplicity. Unfortunately,
Noyce's film failed to find much of an audience and debuted to a disappointing
$12.8 million. While that's better than recent YA box office flops like "The
Host," "The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones," and "Beautiful
Creatures," that's not exactly saying much. This is probably the best
adaptation we're going to get of Lowry's celebrated novel. It's just a shame
that much of the source material's impact is lost simply because the film
version came too late. At least Bridges managed to see his passion project
finally realized.
Final
Rating: 3.5 out of 5
"When
people have the freedom to choose, they choose wrong."